Nonferrous Metal Die Casting Foundry · Indiana

Kokomo Casting Plant

Kokomo, IN · ~1,267 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Kokomo Casting Plant runs at 54% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Nonferrous Metal Die Casting Foundry workplace, earning a grade B.

Kokomo Casting Plant: 1.8 TCR = 54% of Nonferrous Metal Die Casting Foundry BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Kokomo Casting Plant safety composite

Kokomo Casting Plant scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 91% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

74/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 1.77 per 100 workers

Safer than 91% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.51 per 100 workers

Safer than 72% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.6

2016→2024

Kokomo Casting Plant injury rate improved

Kokomo Casting Plant's TCR fell 1.6 from 2.5 in 2016 to 0.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 2.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.29× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.5 · 2017=2.4 · 2018=2.5 · 2019=1.9 · 2020=1.4 · 2021=1.3 · 2022=1.2 · 2024=0.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 331523 · Kokomo, IN AT/BELOW-IND · LARGE

Grade B · TCR 1.8 · 54% of ind

  • DART 0.5 DART
  • RANK #5/13
  • PHOTO Mueller Company
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 170 inj
  • SIZE ~1,267 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Mueller Company (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Kokomo Casting Plant in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Kokomo Casting Plant averages 1.8 TCR (54% of the Nonferrous Metal Die Casting Foundry BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Kokomo Casting Plant TCR series: 2016=2.5 · 2017=2.4 · 2018=2.5 · 2019=1.9 · 2020=1.4 · 2021=1.3 · 2022=1.2 · 2024=0.9 · BLS 3.3

Where Kokomo Casting Plant falls in its industry

221 Nonferrous Metal Die Casting F establishments

Safer than 91% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 13 Nonferrous Metal Die Casting F employers in Indiana.

Kokomo Casting Plant (1,267 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 97 employees and a TCR of 4.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Kokomo Casting Plant
Kokomo Casting Plant (1,267 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 97 employees and a TCR of 4.7

Kokomo Casting Plant has more employees than the Nonferrous Metal Die Casting Foundry median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.9 0.5 9 0 0
2022 1.2 0.5 13 0 0
2021 1.3 0.7 15 0 0
2020 1.4 0.6 14 1 0
2019 1.9 1.2 26 0 0
2018 2.5 1.4 36 1 0
2017 2.4 1.2 30 3 0
2016 2.5 1.5 27 7 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

331523 · IN · Kokomo

221 Nonferrous Metal Die Casting Foundry employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 145 employers in Kokomo, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Mueller Company 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Shiloh Auburn 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2aUSA 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Portland Casting Plant - Fort Recovery Industries 1.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE KOORSEN FIRE & SECURITY 1,267 FTE
STATE-SIZE Great Dane; Brazil, IN 1,268 FTE
STATE-SIZE FSSA Division of Family Resources (00500) 1,265 FTE
STATE-SIZE Carrier Corporation (Indianapollis) 1,278 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kokomo Transmission Plant 3,289 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fiat Chrysler Automobiles- Indiana Transmission Plant 1 1,590 FTE
CITY-NEAR Indiana Transmission Plant 1 1,545 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kokomo Engine Plant 840 FTE
NAT-TCR WYOMING 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Ags 18.5 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Paramount Millwright Services, Inc. 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Ross Downing Buick Gmc Cadillac LLC 1.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Nabholz Construction Corporation 1,267 FTE
NAT-SIZE City of Yuma 1,267 FTE
NAT-SIZE Johnson Controls 1,267 FTE
NAT-SIZE Raritan Bay Medical Center Perth Amboy Division 1,267 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.