Aluminum die-casting foundries · Alabama

2aUSA

Auburn, AL · ~131 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities

The verdict

2aUSA runs at 51% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Aluminum die-casting foundries workplace, earning a grade B.

B
Good Safety Record
1.7
avg TCR · per 100 workers
3.3
industry benchmark (BLS)
6
recordable injuries tracked

Grade compares 2aUSA's OSHA Total Case Rate of 1.7 to the Aluminum die-casting foundries BLS benchmark of 3.3 (51% of benchmark) across 3 years of Form 300A filings (2016–2024). This reflects reported recordable injuries, not an independent safety inspection -- underreporting is a known limitation of employer self-recordkeeping.

Injury rate over time

2aUSA's yearly Total Case Rate, against the 3.3 industry benchmark.

-101234 201720182019 03.3 Industry benchmark2aUSA TCR
Total Case Rate (recordable injuries per 100 full-time workers), OSHA ITA Form 300A. Industry benchmark: BLS IIF, NAICS 331523.

Where 2aUSA falls in its industry

223 Aluminum die-casting foundries establishments

Safer than 91% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Alabama alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 7 Aluminum die-casting foundries employers in Alabama.

Trend analysis for 2aUSA

Between 2017 and 2019, 2aUSA's Total Case Rate improved from 3.0 to 0.0 recordable injuries per 100 full-time workers, a 100% decrease across 2 years of OSHA reporting.

The safest year on record was 2019, at a TCR of 0.0, while 2017 saw the highest rate, at 3.0, a spread of 3.0 points between the best and worst reporting years. That's a wide swing relative to the establishment's overall rate, worth checking the year-by-year table below for whether a single severe year is driving the average, rather than a sustained trend.

Summed across those 3 reporting years, 2aUSA recorded 6 total injuries and illnesses, with no fatalities reported in any of those years. Readers comparing establishments should weigh the 3-year trend above alongside establishment size, since a larger workforce naturally accumulates more raw incidents even at a lower per-100-worker rate.

Verify This Employer with OSHA

The 6 injuries, 1 illnesses shown on this page for 2aUSA are sourced from its own 3 years of mandatory OSHA Form 300A summaries. Cross-check the underlying establishment record directly against the federal source, name, NAICS classification, recordable case totals, and inspection history are all searchable on OSHA's Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data system.

Verify on OSHA Establishment Search

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data. NAICS 331523 - Aluminum die-casting foundries.

DART Rate, Transparent Calculation (2019)

What is the DART rate formula?

DART (Days Away, Restricted, or Transferred) is computed by OSHA as incidents × 200,000 ÷ hours worked. The 200,000-hour denominator equals roughly 100 full-time workers, which lets establishments of very different sizes be compared directly.

0 DART incidents × 200,000 ÷ 158,376 hours worked = 0.00 DART

Methodology: 29 CFR 1904, OSHA Form 300A recordkeeping

Cross-Validating Context, Establishment vs Industry vs State

Benchmark TCR Source
2aUSA (this establishment) 1.69 OSHA ITA Form 300A, 3-year avg
Aluminum die-castings, unfinished, manufacturing industry avg 3.30 BLS IIF, NAICS 331523
Alabama state avg (all industries) 4.09 OSHA ITA, state-level rollup

Industry benchmarks: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Injuries, Illnesses, and Fatalities (IIF) program

Reportable Incident Timeline

Year-by-year reportable incidents (recordable injuries + illnesses + fatalities) submitted by 2aUSA to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Each row anchors to OSHA's inspection records search where you can pull the underlying inspection case numbers and citations for that establishment-year.

Source: OSHA Inspection Information System (IMIS) - inspection case-number records

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 2.1 2.1 2 1 0
2017 3.0 1.5 4 0 0

What this grade means for you

Use this grade as a relative read on 2aUSA's reported OSHA injury record, strong versus its Aluminum die-casting foundries peers, but not a guarantee about any single site today.

  • At 51% of the Aluminum die-casting foundries benchmark, 2aUSA reports fewer injuries than typical peers, still worth asking how safety is managed day to day. Know your rights
  • Judge this record against the wider Aluminum die-casting foundries sector, where injury rates vary widely, before comparing it in isolation. See the industry
  • Grades reflect 2016–2024 filings; check the latest establishment record straight from OSHA, or look up a different employer. Look up another

Safety grades reflect employers' self-reported OSHA Form 300A filings from 2016 to 2024 and can lag current conditions. A grade is not a guarantee that any specific workplace is safe or unsafe today. See our methodology and disclaimer.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is 2aUSA's safety grade?
2aUSA has a safety grade of B (Good Safety Record). This grade is based on their average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 1.7 compared to the BLS industry benchmark of 3.3 for Aluminum die-casting foundries.
How many injuries has 2aUSA reported?
2aUSA has reported 6 total injuries and 0 fatalities across 3 years of OSHA data (2019, 2018, 2017). This data comes from mandatory OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA) reports.

Similar Employers

Matched by safety record across the industry, by workforce size within Alabama, and by nearby establishments in Auburn - a different peer set than the category browse links below.

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.