Overhead Traveling Cranes Manufacturing · Wisconsin

Konecranes Nuclear Equipment and Services

New Berlin, WI · ~122 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Konecranes Nuclear Equipment and Services runs at 12% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Overhead Traveling Cranes Manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Konecranes Nuclear Equipment and Services: 0.4 TCR = 12% of Overhead Traveling Cranes Manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Konecranes Nuclear Equipment and Services safety composite

Konecranes Nuclear Equipment and Services scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 97% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

70/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.41 per 100 workers

Safer than 97% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.68 per 100 workers

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Konecranes Nuclear Equipment and Services: 0.0 → 1.4 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 1.4 TCR · DART/TCR 1.66× in 2024

Konecranes Nuclear Equipment and Services's TCR rose 1.4 from 0.0 in 2016 to 1.4 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1.66× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333923 · New Berlin, WI AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.4 · 12% of ind

  • DART 0.7 DART
  • RANK #2/14
  • PHOTO APG
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~122 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: APG (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Konecranes Nuclear Equipment and Services in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Konecranes Nuclear Equipment and Services averages 0.4 TCR (12% of the Overhead Traveling Cranes Manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Konecranes Nuclear Equipment and Services TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0.9 · 2018=0.7 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0.7 · 2024=1.4 · BLS 3.3

Where Konecranes Nuclear Equipment and Services falls in its industry

157 Overhead Traveling Cranes Manu establishments

Safer than 97% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 14 Overhead Traveling Cranes Manu employers in Wisconsin.

Konecranes Nuclear Equipment and Services (122 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Konecranes Nuclear Equipment and Services
Konecranes Nuclear Equipment and Services (122 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.6

Konecranes Nuclear Equipment and Services has more employees than the Overhead Traveling Cranes Manufacturing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.4 0.7 2 0 0
2023 0.7 0.7 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.7 0.7 1 0 0
2017 0.9 0.0 1 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333923 · WI · New Berlin

157 Overhead Traveling Cranes Manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 183 employers in New Berlin, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR APG 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Columbus Mckinnon Magnetek 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Seatrax, Inc. Service Department 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Genie Industries HUB 0.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Oostburg Concrete Products 122 FTE
STATE-SIZE Security Luebke Roofing 122 FTE
STATE-SIZE SCHOEP'S ICE CREAM - DIVISION STREET 122 FTE
STATE-SIZE Green Bay Nonwovens 122 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pieper Electric, Inc. 1,154 FTE
CITY-NEAR 5531 502 FTE
CITY-NEAR Milwaukee Office 425 FTE
CITY-NEAR KS Energy Services (New Berlin) 411 FTE
NAT-TCR Metal Casting Technology 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR UPMC Benefit Management Services 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Corporate Office 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Fort Hill 0.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Wolgast Corporation 122 FTE
NAT-SIZE York County Sheriff Office 122 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kettle Falls Lumber - WP 122 FTE
NAT-SIZE Treatt 122 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.