Third Party Administration of Insurance and Pension Funds · Pennsylvania

UPMC Benefit Management Services

Pittsburgh, PA · ~603 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.4
Avg TCR
0.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

UPMC Benefit Management Services runs at 82% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Third Party Administration of Insurance and Pension Funds workplace, earning a grade C.

UPMC Benefit Management Services: 0.4 TCR = 82% of Third Party Administration of Insurance and Pension Funds BLS 0.5 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

UPMC Benefit Management Services safety composite

UPMC Benefit Management Services scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 67% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

63/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 0.41 per 100 workers

Safer than 67% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 67% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.1

2016→2021

UPMC Benefit Management Services injury rate improved

UPMC Benefit Management Services's TCR fell 1.1 from 1.2 in 2016 to 0.1 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2016 at 1.2 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.2 · 2017=0.3 · 2018=0.0 · 2021=0.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 524292 · Pittsburgh, PA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 0.4 · 82% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK P67
  • PHOTO Marsh Saldana Inc
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~603 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Marsh Saldana Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

UPMC Benefit Management Services in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows UPMC Benefit Management Services averages 0.4 TCR (82% of the Third Party Administration of Insurance and Pension Funds BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

UPMC Benefit Management Services TCR series: 2016=1.2 · 2017=0.3 · 2018=0 · 2021=0.1 · BLS 0.5

Where UPMC Benefit Management Services falls in its industry

21 Third Party Administration of establishments

Safer than 67% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers
UPMC Benefit Management Services (603 employees, TCR 0.4) among 14 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 133 employees and a TCR of 0.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 15 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 01234 Average employees Total Case Rate UPMC Benefit Management Services
UPMC Benefit Management Services (603 employees, TCR 0.4) among 14 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 133 employees and a TCR of 0.8

UPMC Benefit Management Services has more employees than the Third Party Administration of Insurance median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 - - 1 0 0
2023 - - 1 0 0
2022 - - 1 0 0
2021 0.1 0.0 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.3 0.0 1 0 0
2016 1.2 0.3 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

524292 · PA · Pittsburgh

21 Third Party Administration of Insurance and Pension Funds employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 1,170 employers in Pittsburgh, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Marsh Saldana Inc 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR CareSource Management Services LLC 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR EMS Management & Consultants 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR PA Employees Benefit Trust Fund 0.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE 0401 MANHEIM PENNSYLVANIA 1190 LANCASTER RD 604 FTE
STATE-SIZE Prospect Airport Services PHL 604 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kendal-Crosslands Communities 604 FTE
STATE-SIZE Camp Hill - Utley Drive 604 FTE
CITY-NEAR United States Steel COrporation 15,229 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Pittsburgh- Oakland 14,135 FTE
CITY-NEAR UPMC Presbyterian Shadyside (PUH) 13,900 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Pittsburgh-Oakland 13,208 FTE
NAT-TCR Fort Hill 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Metal Casting Technology 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Konecranes Nuclear Equipment and Services 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR National Distribution Centers LLC-2020 RT 130 0.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE PayneCrest Electric 603 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sanderson Farms Hazlehurst Processing 603 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ferring Pharmaceuticals Inc. 603 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gulfspan Industrial, LLC 603 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.