Executive offices, federal, state, and local (e.g., governor, mayor, president) · Indiana

Kosciusko County Government

Warsaw, IN · ~365 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.6
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Kosciusko County Government runs at 143% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Executive offices, federal, state, and local (e.g., governor, mayor, president) workplace, earning a grade D.

Kosciusko County Government: 4.6 TCR = 143% of Executive offices, federal, state, and local (e.g., governor, mayor, president) BLS 3.2 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Kosciusko County Government safety composite

Kosciusko County Government scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 27%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

43/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.58 per 100 workers

Safer than 52% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.86 per 100 workers

Safer than 27% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Kosciusko County Government held a steady TCR band

Kosciusko County Government's TCR held near 0.2 from 5.2 in 2021 to 5.3 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0.84× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=5.2 · 2023=3.2 · 2024=5.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 921110 · Warsaw, IN ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 4.6 · 143% of ind

  • DART 3.9 DART
  • RANK #11/33
  • PHOTO City of Greensboro- …
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 44 inj
  • SIZE ~365 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: City of Greensboro- Engineering and Inspections (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Kosciusko County Government in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Kosciusko County Government averages 4.6 TCR (143% of the Executive offices, federal, state, and local (e.g., governor, mayor, president) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Kosciusko County Government TCR series: 2021=5.2 · 2023=3.2 · 2024=5.3 · BLS 3.2

Where Kosciusko County Government falls in its industry

1,010 Executive offices, federal, st establishments

Safer than 52% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #11 safest of 33 Executive offices, federal, st employers in Indiana.

Kosciusko County Government (365 employees, TCR 4.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 4.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Kosciusko County Government
Kosciusko County Government (365 employees, TCR 4.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 4.8

Kosciusko County Government has more employees than the Executive offices, federal, state, and l median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.3 3.9 18 0 0
2023 3.2 1.4 12 0 0
2021 5.2 5.2 14 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

921110 · IN · Warsaw

1,010 Executive offices, federal, state, and local (e.g., governor, mayor, president) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 100 employers in Warsaw, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR City of Greensboro- Engineering and Inspections 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ridgefield Town Hall 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fauquier County 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Allendale Charter Township 4.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE WM 1371 365 FTE
STATE-SIZE 015 - Ben Davis High School 365 FTE
STATE-SIZE Thor Motor Coach/Plant 350 366 FTE
STATE-SIZE Jasper Operations - Decora 364 FTE
CITY-NEAR Zimmer Biomet West Campus 4,088 FTE
CITY-NEAR Zimmer Biomet 3,818 FTE
CITY-NEAR Zimmer Biomet North Campus 2,533 FTE
CITY-NEAR DePuy Synthes Warsaw 1,151 FTE
NAT-TCR Syracuse Feedyard 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Shoprite of Avenue I 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Shoprite of Wharton 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR CCAG UROGYN Spine and Pain 4.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Casbe - San Bernardino 365 FTE
NAT-SIZE New Excelsior Farming, LLC 365 FTE
NAT-SIZE QGS Development, Inc. 365 FTE
NAT-SIZE Celanese LTD, Clear Lake 365 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.