Printing, gravure (except books, grey goods) · North Carolina

KTP Lexington

Lexington, NC · ~171 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

KTP Lexington runs at 183% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Printing, gravure (except books, grey goods) workplace, earning a grade D.

KTP Lexington: 6.0 TCR = 183% of Printing, gravure (except books, grey goods) BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

KTP Lexington safety composite

KTP Lexington scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 11%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

22/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.04 per 100 workers

Safer than 11% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.98 per 100 workers

Safer than 14% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.7

2016→2024

KTP Lexington injury rate improved

KTP Lexington's TCR fell 3.7 from 8.4 in 2016 to 4.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 8.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.66× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=8.4 · 2018=6.6 · 2019=4.8 · 2020=6.0 · 2021=7.8 · 2022=4.3 · 2023=5.7 · 2024=4.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 323111 · Lexington, NC ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 6.0 · 183% of ind

  • DART 4.0 DART
  • RANK #89/92
  • PHOTO Color Communications…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 71 inj
  • SIZE ~171 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Color Communications, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

KTP Lexington in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows KTP Lexington averages 6.0 TCR (183% of the Printing, gravure (except books, grey goods) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

KTP Lexington TCR series: 2016=8.4 · 2018=6.6 · 2019=4.8 · 2020=6 · 2021=7.8 · 2022=4.3 · 2023=5.7 · 2024=4.6 · BLS 3.3

Where KTP Lexington falls in its industry

2,001 Printing, gravure (except book establishments

Safer than 11% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #89 safest of 92 Printing, gravure (except book employers in North Carolina.

KTP Lexington (171 employees, TCR 6.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 2.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate KTP Lexington
KTP Lexington (171 employees, TCR 6.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 2.6

KTP Lexington has more employees than the Printing, gravure (except books, grey go median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.6 4.0 7 0 0
2023 5.7 5.1 10 0 0
2022 4.3 2.5 7 0 0
2021 7.8 3.9 12 0 0
2020 6.0 2.4 10 0 0
2019 4.8 4.2 7 0 0
2018 6.6 4.7 7 0 0
2016 8.4 7.6 11 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

323111 · NC · Lexington

2,001 Printing, gravure (except books, grey goods) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 120 employers in Lexington, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Color Communications, LLC 6.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Continental Identification Products 6.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Curtis 1000 Inc. - 0223-MNFR1 6.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ennis Tag & Label 6.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Asphalt Paving 171 FTE
STATE-SIZE Corp et al 171 FTE
STATE-SIZE Chesapeake Containment Systems, Inc. 171 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kings Mountain 171 FTE
CITY-NEAR Davidson County Schools 3,351 FTE
CITY-NEAR Davidson County Government 1,237 FTE
CITY-NEAR Atrium Windows & Door 910 FTE
CITY-NEAR ASCO Power Technologies 639 FTE
NAT-TCR Price Rite Store 208 Driving Park 6.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Gilman Cheese 6.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Page Hardware & Appliance Co. 6.0 TCR
NAT-TCR St. David's Medical Center 6.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Westampton Nj - 25 East Park 171 FTE
NAT-SIZE Victoria HealthCare, Inc. (d/b/a Select Specialty Hospital - Miami) 171 FTE
NAT-SIZE First Student - Middle Island, NY 171 FTE
NAT-SIZE Palm Garden of Vero Beach, LLC 171 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.