Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) · Ohio

Kyger Creek Station

Cheshire, OH · ~224 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
4.3
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
1
Fatality
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Kyger Creek Station runs at 357% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) workplace, earning a grade F.

Kyger Creek Station: 4.3 TCR = 357% of Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) BLS 1.2 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Kyger Creek Station safety composite

Kyger Creek Station scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 71% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

29/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.28 per 100 workers

Safer than 9% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

Fatalities
F 1

Safer than 1% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.8

2016→2024

Kyger Creek Station injury rate improved

Kyger Creek Station's TCR fell 0.8 from 1.9 in 2016 to 1.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 9.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.9 · 2018=4.5 · 2019=3.9 · 2020=6.6 · 2021=9.5 · 2022=4.1 · 2023=2.7 · 2024=1.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221112 · Cheshire, OH ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 4.3 · 357% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #25/25
  • PHOTO Wellhead Services, Inc
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 24 inj
  • SIZE ~224 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Wellhead Services, Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Kyger Creek Station in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Kyger Creek Station averages 4.3 TCR (357% of the Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Kyger Creek Station TCR series: 2016=1.9 · 2018=4.5 · 2019=3.9 · 2020=6.6 · 2021=9.5 · 2022=4.1 · 2023=2.7 · 2024=1.1 · BLS 1.2

Where Kyger Creek Station falls in its industry

846 Electric power generation, fos establishments

Safer than 9% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #25 safest of 25 Electric power generation, fos employers in Ohio.

Kyger Creek Station (224 employees, TCR 4.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Kyger Creek Station
Kyger Creek Station (224 employees, TCR 4.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5

Kyger Creek Station has more employees than the Electric power generation, fossil fuel ( median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.1 0.0 0 2 0
2023 2.7 0.5 1 4 0
2022 4.1 3.1 2 6 0
2021 9.5 6.5 4 15 0
2020 6.6 2.4 5 9 1
2019 3.9 0.9 4 5 0
2018 4.5 1.6 5 6 0
2016 1.9 1.1 3 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221112 · OH · Cheshire

846 Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 9 employers in Cheshire, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Wellhead Services, Inc 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bridgeport Energy 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR AMEREN MISSOURI - GETS - Gen Const & Maint Serv (PCM) 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Clifty Creek Station 4.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE THORWORKS INDUSTRIES, INC. 224 FTE
STATE-SIZE Nelson Stark 224 FTE
STATE-SIZE Medina Roofing Plant 224 FTE
STATE-SIZE RW Screw LLC 224 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gavin Power, LLC 210 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gavin Plant 179 FTE
CITY-NEAR MPW Environmental Services, Inc. - Gavin Power 95 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lightstone Generation - Gavin 68 FTE
NAT-TCR Manteno 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR American Crystal Sugar Company Crookston 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Casa Mechanical Services 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 332 East Main St 4.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Quality Custom Distribution - Charlotte 224 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cooper-Booth Wholesale Company 224 FTE
NAT-SIZE Trans-Ocean Products, Inc. 224 FTE
NAT-SIZE fORT mYERS 224 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.