Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) · Indiana

Clifty Creek Station

Madison, IN · ~253 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
4.3
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Clifty Creek Station runs at 359% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) workplace, earning a grade F.

Clifty Creek Station: 4.3 TCR = 359% of Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) BLS 1.2 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Clifty Creek Station safety composite

Clifty Creek Station scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 9%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

24/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.31 per 100 workers

Safer than 9% of industry peers

DART rate
F 1.43 per 100 workers

Safer than 23% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.5

2016→2024

Clifty Creek Station injury rate improved

Clifty Creek Station's TCR fell 2.5 from 4.4 in 2016 to 1.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 11.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.33× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.4 · 2018=2.9 · 2019=2.6 · 2020=11.2 · 2021=4.6 · 2022=1.8 · 2023=5.0 · 2024=1.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221112 · Madison, IN ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 4.3 · 359% of ind

  • DART 1.4 DART
  • RANK #18/18
  • PHOTO Wellhead Services, Inc
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 18 inj
  • SIZE ~253 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Wellhead Services, Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Clifty Creek Station in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Clifty Creek Station averages 4.3 TCR (359% of the Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Clifty Creek Station TCR series: 2016=4.4 · 2018=2.9 · 2019=2.6 · 2020=11.2 · 2021=4.6 · 2022=1.8 · 2023=5 · 2024=1.9 · BLS 1.2

Where Clifty Creek Station falls in its industry

846 Electric power generation, fos establishments

Safer than 9% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #18 safest of 18 Electric power generation, fos employers in Indiana.

Clifty Creek Station (253 employees, TCR 4.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Clifty Creek Station
Clifty Creek Station (253 employees, TCR 4.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5

Clifty Creek Station has more employees than the Electric power generation, fossil fuel ( median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.9 1.4 3 1 0
2023 5.0 0.9 4 7 0
2022 1.8 0.0 2 2 0
2021 4.6 1.9 4 6 0
2020 11.2 5.2 0 26 0
2019 2.6 0.0 0 7 0
2018 2.9 0.4 1 7 0
2016 4.4 0.7 4 9 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221112 · IN · Madison

846 Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 39 employers in Madison, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Wellhead Services, Inc 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR PSE, OLY - Olympia Business Office 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kyger Creek Station 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Grant Town Power Plant 4.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Shared Field Services 253 FTE
STATE-SIZE Performance Services Inc. 253 FTE
STATE-SIZE 1481 - Evansville Lloyd Expressway 253 FTE
STATE-SIZE 152 - Whitestown 253 FTE
CITY-NEAR Arvin Sango, Inc. 795 FTE
CITY-NEAR Norton King's Daughters' Health Main Campus 605 FTE
CITY-NEAR Vehicle Service Group 495 FTE
CITY-NEAR Madison Precision Products 471 FTE
NAT-TCR Atlas Bolt & Screw Ashland 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Ardagh Glass Inc Port Allegany 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Hanlon Electric Company 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Leppert Machine Co Inc 4.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE MEPPI512-510 253 FTE
NAT-SIZE PCSI Location 551 253 FTE
NAT-SIZE Breinigsville 253 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hampstead 253 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.