Aluminum ingot, secondary smelting of aluminum and manufacturing · Pennsylvania

Kymera International - Reading Alloys

Robesonia, PA · ~134 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Kymera International - Reading Alloys runs at 170% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Aluminum ingot, secondary smelting of aluminum and manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Kymera International - Reading Alloys: 5.6 TCR = 170% of Aluminum ingot, secondary smelting of aluminum and manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Kymera International - Reading Alloys safety composite

Kymera International - Reading Alloys scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 17%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

32/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.6 per 100 workers

Safer than 32% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.83 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Kymera International - Reading Alloys held a steady TCR band

Kymera International - Reading Alloys's TCR held near 0.3 from 5.8 in 2023 to 5.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 5.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.86× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2023=5.8 · 2024=5.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 331314 · Robesonia, PA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 5.6 · 170% of ind

  • DART 4.8 DART
  • RANK #4/6
  • PHOTO Tennessee Aluminum P…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 18 inj
  • SIZE ~134 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Tennessee Aluminum Processors (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Kymera International - Reading Alloys in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Kymera International - Reading Alloys averages 5.6 TCR (170% of the Aluminum ingot, secondary smelting of aluminum and manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Kymera International - Reading Alloys TCR series: 2023=5.8 · 2024=5.4 · BLS 3.3

Where Kymera International - Reading Alloys falls in its industry

103 Aluminum ingot, secondary smel establishments

Safer than 32% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 6 Aluminum ingot, secondary smel employers in Pennsylvania.

Kymera International - Reading Alloys (134 employees, TCR 5.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 4.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Kymera International - Reading Alloys
Kymera International - Reading Alloys (134 employees, TCR 5.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 4.2

Kymera International - Reading Alloys has more employees than the Aluminum ingot, secondary smelting of al median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.4 4.8 9 0 0
2023 5.8 3.5 9 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

331314 · PA · Robesonia

103 Aluminum ingot, secondary smelting of aluminum and manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 14 employers in Robesonia, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Tennessee Aluminum Processors 5.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kentucky Smelting Technology 5.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Decatur 5.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Matalco (US) Inc. Lordstown 5.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE MARSA Inc. 134 FTE
STATE-SIZE Home ReNu 134 FTE
STATE-SIZE east coast hoist inc 134 FTE
STATE-SIZE Elverson Whitford 134 FTE
CITY-NEAR CS Wholesale Grocers : Robesonia, PA (GDC) 328 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2967-PA97 132 FTE
CITY-NEAR Reading Alloys 100 FTE
CITY-NEAR Robesonia - Tubes & Cores - C332 84 FTE
NAT-TCR L!VE Technologies 3DX 5.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Unr Pack Place 5.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 1749 Austell 5.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Ohio Pet Foods Inc. 5.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Caton Park Rehabilitation and Nursing Center 134 FTE
NAT-SIZE Eco Services Operations Corp 134 FTE
NAT-SIZE Daimay North America Automotive Inc 134 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rassini Brakes LLC 134 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.