Aluminum ingot, secondary smelting of aluminum and manufacturing · Kentucky

Kentucky Smelting Technology

Paris, KY · ~57 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Kentucky Smelting Technology runs at 165% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Aluminum ingot, secondary smelting of aluminum and manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Kentucky Smelting Technology: 5.4 TCR = 165% of Aluminum ingot, secondary smelting of aluminum and manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Kentucky Smelting Technology safety composite

Kentucky Smelting Technology scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 34%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

56/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.44 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−7.6

2016→2024

Kentucky Smelting Technology injury rate improved

Kentucky Smelting Technology's TCR fell 7.6 from 7.6 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 16.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=7.6 · 2018=16.1 · 2019=11.3 · 2020=4.6 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=3.8 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 331314 · Paris, KY ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.4 · 165% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #12/14
  • PHOTO Matalco (US) Inc. Lo…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 22 inj
  • SIZE ~57 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Matalco (US) Inc. Lordstown (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Kentucky employers → · Look up another →

Kentucky Smelting Technology in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Kentucky Smelting Technology averages 5.4 TCR (165% of the Aluminum ingot, secondary smelting of aluminum and manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Kentucky Smelting Technology TCR series: 2016=7.6 · 2018=16.1 · 2019=11.3 · 2020=4.6 · 2021=0 · 2022=3.8 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Kentucky Smelting Technology falls in its industry

103 Aluminum ingot, secondary smel establishments

Safer than 34% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Kentucky alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #12 safest of 14 Aluminum ingot, secondary smel employers in Kentucky.

Kentucky Smelting Technology (57 employees, TCR 5.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 4.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Kentucky Smelting Technology
Kentucky Smelting Technology (57 employees, TCR 5.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 4.2

Kentucky Smelting Technology has fewer employees than the Aluminum ingot, secondary smelting of al median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 3.8 1.9 2 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 4.6 2.3 2 0 0
2019 11.3 5.7 6 0 0
2018 16.1 12.5 9 0 0
2016 7.6 7.6 3 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

331314 · KY · Paris

103 Aluminum ingot, secondary smelting of aluminum and manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,805 rated employers in Kentucky with headcount on file · 31 employers in Paris, KY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Matalco (US) Inc. Lordstown 5.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Berman Bros Iron and Metal Co., Inc. 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tennessee Aluminum Processors 5.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kymera International - Reading Alloys 5.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Morganfield Office and Storeroom 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE Taylor County Rural Electric Cooperative Corporation 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE Schnell Contractors, Inc. 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fox Enterprises Main Office 57 FTE
CITY-NEAR Central Motor Wheel of America 711 FTE
CITY-NEAR Central Motor Wheel of America dba CMWA 556 FTE
CITY-NEAR 493 278 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 493 276 FTE
NAT-TCR SIFCO Forge 5.4 TCR
NAT-TCR USU 5.4 TCR
NAT-TCR WCD LLC Vandalia 5.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Dbp Row 5.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE FV Katie Ann 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE Camden Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE MBI Products Co. 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE John F. Shea Co., Inc. 57 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.