Aircraft conversions (i.e., major modifications to system) · Maryland

L3 Technologies: Andrews AFB

Andrews Afb, MD · ~26 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

L3 Technologies: Andrews AFB runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Aircraft conversions (i.e., major modifications to system) workplace, earning a grade C.

L3 Technologies: Andrews AFB: 0.0 TCR = 0% of Aircraft conversions (i.e., major modifications to system) BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

L3 Technologies: Andrews AFB safety composite

L3 Technologies: Andrews AFB scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

81/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

L3 Technologies: Andrews AFB held a steady TCR band

L3 Technologies: Andrews AFB's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2018 at 0.0 TCR.

2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336411 · Andrews Afb, MD AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #0/5
  • PHOTO Jennings Aeronautics…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~26 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Jennings Aeronautics, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maryland employers → · Look up another →

L3 Technologies: Andrews AFB in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows L3 Technologies: Andrews AFB averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the Aircraft conversions (i.e., major modifications to system) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

L3 Technologies: Andrews AFB TCR series: 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · BLS 3.3

Where L3 Technologies: Andrews AFB falls in its industry

390 Aircraft conversions (i.e., ma establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Maryland alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #0 safest of 5 Aircraft conversions (i.e., ma employers in Maryland.

L3 Technologies: Andrews AFB (26 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 151 employees and a TCR of 1.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,0008,00010,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate L3 Technologies: Andrews AFB
L3 Technologies: Andrews AFB (26 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 151 employees and a TCR of 1.7

L3 Technologies: Andrews AFB has fewer employees than the Aircraft conversions (i.e., major modifi median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336411 · MD · Andrews Afb

390 Aircraft conversions (i.e., major modifications to system) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,213 rated employers in Maryland with headcount on file · 8 employers in Andrews Afb, MD · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Jennings Aeronautics, Inc. 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lockheed Martin Corporation FortWaltonBchFL-HollywoodBl (1825) 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR General Atomics - Poway - A16 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR GA Sys Integration/Aero Srvcs-Flex 0.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE VALO BioMedia NA, LLC. Maryland 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Princess Anne Hatchery 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Salisbury Hatchery #3 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE BTR D&L LLC 26 FTE
CITY-NEAR DI - Joint Base Andrews (VIPSAM) 376 FTE
CITY-NEAR Executive Rotary Wing US MD Andrews AFB MD969 335 FTE
CITY-NEAR DI - Joint Base Andrews (Executive Wing) 189 FTE
CITY-NEAR DI - Joint Base Andrews (Rotary Wing) 76 FTE
NAT-TCR 1655 3rd St,San Francisco (MB3 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Carbro Constructors Corp Main 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Kinship Pointe Seward 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Chicago Corporate 0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE SP - Spokane 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE SI - Salida 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sheet Metal 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE OG - Ogden 26 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.