Crushing machinery, portable, manufacturing · Minnesota

LaBounty Manufacturing

Two Harbors, MN · ~86 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

LaBounty Manufacturing runs at 76% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Crushing machinery, portable, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

LaBounty Manufacturing: 2.5 TCR = 76% of Crushing machinery, portable, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

LaBounty Manufacturing safety composite

LaBounty Manufacturing scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 67% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

57/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.5 per 100 workers

Safer than 67% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.57 per 100 workers

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.0

2017→2024

LaBounty Manufacturing injury rate improved

LaBounty Manufacturing's TCR fell 1.0 from 4.2 in 2017 to 3.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 6.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.63× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=4.2 · 2018=2.0 · 2019=1.1 · 2020=1.3 · 2021=6.1 · 2022=1.0 · 2023=1.2 · 2024=3.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333120 · Two Harbors, MN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.5 · 76% of ind

  • DART 1.6 DART
  • RANK #4/21
  • PHOTO Davenport Works
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 18 inj
  • SIZE ~86 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Davenport Works (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

LaBounty Manufacturing in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows LaBounty Manufacturing averages 2.5 TCR (76% of the Crushing machinery, portable, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

LaBounty Manufacturing TCR series: 2017=4.2 · 2018=2 · 2019=1.1 · 2020=1.3 · 2021=6.1 · 2022=1 · 2023=1.2 · 2024=3.1 · BLS 3.3

Where LaBounty Manufacturing falls in its industry

400 Crushing machinery, portable, establishments

Safer than 67% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 21 Crushing machinery, portable, employers in Minnesota.

LaBounty Manufacturing (86 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 87 employees and a TCR of 4.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate LaBounty Manufacturing
LaBounty Manufacturing (86 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 87 employees and a TCR of 4.0

LaBounty Manufacturing has fewer employees than the Crushing machinery, portable, manufactur median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.1 1.6 2 0 0
2023 1.2 1.2 1 0 0
2022 1.0 0.0 1 0 0
2021 6.1 3.1 6 0 0
2020 1.3 0.0 1 0 0
2019 1.1 0.0 1 0 0
2018 2.0 1.0 2 0 0
2017 4.2 1.0 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333120 · MN · Two Harbors

400 Crushing machinery, portable, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 28 employers in Two Harbors, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Davenport Works 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wacker Neuson America Corporation 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Werk- Brau- 2500 Building 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tesmec USA, Inc. 2.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE 34 RECC 86 FTE
STATE-SIZE Palmer Soderberg, Inc. 86 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tri-State Drilling 86 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lloyd's Construction Services, Inc. 86 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lake County 150 FTE
CITY-NEAR Louisiana-Pacific Two Harbors 133 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lake View Hospital 123 FTE
CITY-NEAR Two Harbors Machine Shop, Inc. 93 FTE
NAT-TCR Statewide Labor Corporation 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Sheraton LaGuardia East Hotel 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Accurate Mechanical Contractors, Inc. 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Precision Metal Industries/1408 2.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Administration Office and DTAC 86 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tejas Tubular Products Casing 86 FTE
NAT-SIZE Grannas Bros. Stone & Asphalt Co., Inc 86 FTE
NAT-SIZE Chicago Hardware & Fixture Company 86 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.