Hardening (i.e., heat treating) metals and metal products for the trade · Texas

Tejas Tubular Products Casing

Houston, TX · ~86 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Tejas Tubular Products Casing runs at 151% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Hardening (i.e., heat treating) metals and metal products for the trade workplace, earning a grade D.

Tejas Tubular Products Casing: 5.0 TCR = 151% of Hardening (i.e., heat treating) metals and metal products for the trade BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Tejas Tubular Products Casing safety composite

Tejas Tubular Products Casing scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 54% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 40%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

48/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.97 per 100 workers

Safer than 40% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.62 per 100 workers

Safer than 54% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Tejas Tubular Products Casing: 0.9 → 1.6 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 13.3 TCR · DART/TCR 0.33× in 2024

Tejas Tubular Products Casing's TCR rose 0.8 from 0.9 in 2017 to 1.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 13.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.33× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332811 · Houston, TX ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.0 · 151% of ind

  • DART 1.6 DART
  • RANK #14/16
  • PHOTO FPM Heat Treating - …
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 31 inj
  • SIZE ~86 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: FPM Heat Treating - Cherry Valley (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Tejas Tubular Products Casing in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Tejas Tubular Products Casing averages 5.0 TCR (151% of the Hardening (i.e., heat treating) metals and metal products for the trade BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Tejas Tubular Products Casing TCR series: 2017=0.9 · 2018=5.6 · 2020=6.3 · 2021=13.3 · 2022=5.8 · 2023=1.3 · 2024=1.6 · BLS 3.3

Where Tejas Tubular Products Casing falls in its industry

248 Hardening (i.e., heat treating establishments

Safer than 40% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #14 safest of 16 Hardening (i.e., heat treating employers in Texas.

Tejas Tubular Products Casing (86 employees, TCR 5.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 38 employees and a TCR of 4.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Tejas Tubular Products Casing
Tejas Tubular Products Casing (86 employees, TCR 5.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 38 employees and a TCR of 4.2

Tejas Tubular Products Casing has more employees than the Hardening (i.e., heat treating) metals a median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.6 1.6 2 0 0
2023 1.3 1.3 3 0 0
2022 5.8 5.8 12 0 0
2021 13.3 13.3 3 0 0
2020 6.3 6.3 3 0 0
2018 5.6 5.6 7 0 0
2017 0.9 0.9 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332811 · TX · Houston

248 Hardening (i.e., heat treating) metals and metal products for the trade employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 5,116 employers in Houston, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR FPM Heat Treating - Cherry Valley 5.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Nitrex Inc - Nevada Operations 4.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Erie Steel LTD 4.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Nitrex, Inc. IN 4.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Village Farms, Permian Basin 86 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cal-Maine Food, Inc.- Klesel Complex 86 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sundown Tubing Testing 86 FTE
STATE-SIZE San Antonio Division 86 FTE
CITY-NEAR IAH IAH 11,560 FTE
CITY-NEAR IAH - Airport United Airlines Offices 10,239 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6925-IAH 9,442 FTE
CITY-NEAR Houston Methodist Hospital Texas Medical Center 8,873 FTE
NAT-TCR Jay's Furniture Products 5.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Pueblo, CO 5.0 TCR
NAT-TCR FAYETTEVILLE 5.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Tucson Water 5.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Grannas Bros. Stone & Asphalt Co., Inc 86 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ranger Die, Inc. 86 FTE
NAT-SIZE LaBounty Manufacturing 86 FTE
NAT-SIZE Administration Office and DTAC 86 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.