Continuing Care Retirement Communities · California

Laguna Honda Hospital

San Francisco, CA · ~1,336 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
11.0
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Laguna Honda Hospital runs at 289% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Continuing Care Retirement Communities workplace, earning a grade F.

Laguna Honda Hospital: 11.0 TCR = 289% of Continuing Care Retirement Communities BLS 3.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Laguna Honda Hospital safety composite

Laguna Honda Hospital scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 25%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

33/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.99 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.32 per 100 workers

Safer than 28% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.1

2017→2024

Laguna Honda Hospital injury rate improved

Laguna Honda Hospital's TCR fell 1.1 from 10.2 in 2017 to 9.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 14.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.58× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=10.2 · 2018=11.5 · 2020=10.8 · 2021=10.0 · 2022=10.8 · 2023=14.4 · 2024=9.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · San Francisco, CA ABOVE-IND · LARGE

Grade F · TCR 11.0 · 289% of ind

  • DART 6.3 DART
  • RANK #124/216
  • PHOTO Halcyon House
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 981 inj
  • SIZE ~1,336 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Halcyon House (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Laguna Honda Hospital in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Laguna Honda Hospital averages 11.0 TCR (289% of the Continuing Care Retirement Communities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Laguna Honda Hospital TCR series: 2017=10.2 · 2018=11.5 · 2020=10.8 · 2021=10 · 2022=10.8 · 2023=14.4 · 2024=9.2 · BLS 3.8

Where Laguna Honda Hospital falls in its industry

4,127 Continuing Care Retirement Com establishments

Safer than 25% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #124 safest of 216 Continuing Care Retirement Com employers in California.

Laguna Honda Hospital (1,336 employees, TCR 11.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Laguna Honda Hospital
Laguna Honda Hospital (1,336 employees, TCR 11.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Laguna Honda Hospital has more employees than the Continuing Care Retirement Communities median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 9.2 6.3 121 8 0
2023 14.4 7.1 168 35 0
2022 10.8 7.7 149 3 0
2021 10.0 7.6 131 10 0
2020 10.8 6.3 131 21 0
2018 11.5 9.4 160 2 0
2017 10.2 7.3 121 7 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · CA · San Francisco

4,127 Continuing Care Retirement Communities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 1,144 employers in San Francisco, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Halcyon House 11.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR VSL Victoria, LLC 11.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hillside Senior Living 11.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ellington Assisted Living Services, LLC 11.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Aerojet Rocketdyne - Canoga Park 1,336 FTE
STATE-SIZE CASGA - SAN GABRIEL HUB 1,336 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sun Basket 1,337 FTE
STATE-SIZE Yusen Terminals LLC 1,335 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC San Francisco 18,070 FTE
CITY-NEAR DoorDash, Inc. 12,430 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC San Francisco Health 12,262 FTE
CITY-NEAR SFO - Airport United Airlines Offices 11,622 FTE
NAT-TCR The Elephant Sanctuary in Tennessee 11.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Microvision 11.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Hwy 60 11.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Maine Course Hospitality Group - Homewood Suites 11.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Mission Medical Associates 1,336 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wild Horse Pass Hotel & Casino 1,336 FTE
NAT-SIZE Romulus Powertrain 1,336 FTE
NAT-SIZE Amazon Transportation Services : PNE5 1,336 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.