Water treatment and distribution · California

Lake Arrowhead Community Services District

Blue Jay, CA · ~56 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
12.9
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Lake Arrowhead Community Services District runs at 1077% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Water treatment and distribution workplace, earning a grade F.

Lake Arrowhead Community Services District: 12.9 TCR = 1077% of Water treatment and distribution BLS 1.2 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Lake Arrowhead Community Services District safety composite

Lake Arrowhead Community Services District scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 6%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

25/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 12.92 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.49 per 100 workers

Safer than 27% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Lake Arrowhead Community Services District: 6.8 → 13.5 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 21.0 TCR · DART/TCR 0.35× in 2023

Lake Arrowhead Community Services District's TCR rose 6.7 from 6.8 in 2018 to 13.5 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 21.0 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.35× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221310 · Blue Jay, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 12.9 · 1077% of ind

  • DART 4.5 DART
  • RANK #166/176
  • PHOTO City of Goshen Water…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 33 inj
  • SIZE ~56 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: City of Goshen Water & Sewer (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Lake Arrowhead Community Services District in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Lake Arrowhead Community Services District averages 12.9 TCR (1077% of the Water treatment and distribution BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Lake Arrowhead Community Services District TCR series: 2018=6.8 · 2019=18.9 · 2020=10.5 · 2021=6.8 · 2022=21 · 2023=13.5 · BLS 1.2

Where Lake Arrowhead Community Services District falls in its industry

727 Water treatment and distributi establishments

Safer than 6% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #166 safest of 176 Water treatment and distributi employers in California.

Lake Arrowhead Community Services District (56 employees, TCR 12.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 4.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Lake Arrowhead Community Services District
Lake Arrowhead Community Services District (56 employees, TCR 12.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 4.2

Lake Arrowhead Community Services District has more employees than the Water treatment and distribution median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 13.5 4.5 6 0 0
2022 21.0 16.4 7 2 0
2021 6.8 2.3 3 0 0
2020 10.5 6.3 5 0 0
2019 18.9 2.1 9 0 0
2018 6.8 2.3 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221310 · CA · Blue Jay

727 Water treatment and distribution employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR City of Goshen Water & Sewer 12.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR City of Saginaw Water Treatment Plant 12.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hixson Utility District 13.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR IOWA LAKES REGIONAL WATER 12.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Wallace Brothers 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE New Sun Farms, Inc 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE 1624 Poole Blvd., Yuba City, CA 95993 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE Copperhill 56 FTE
CITY-NEAR Store 1 102 FTE
NAT-TCR National Distributors, Inc. 12.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Valley Pallet and Crating LLC 12.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Metro Electric, Inc. 12.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Town of Forest City - Police Department 12.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Truss Plant 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE Academy Fire - Grand Prairie BCI 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE American Bituminous Company 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gmi2 - Grants Management & Innovation 56 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.