Electrical contractors · Ohio

Lake Erie Electric of Toledo, Inc.

Bowling Green, OH · ~125 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.4
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Lake Erie Electric of Toledo, Inc. runs at 49% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Electrical contractors workplace, earning a grade A.

Lake Erie Electric of Toledo, Inc.: 1.4 TCR = 49% of Electrical contractors BLS 2.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Lake Erie Electric of Toledo, Inc. safety composite

Lake Erie Electric of Toledo, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 72% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 48%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

58/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.37 per 100 workers

Safer than 72% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.71 per 100 workers

Safer than 48% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.7

2016→2024

Lake Erie Electric of Toledo, Inc. injury rate improved

Lake Erie Electric of Toledo, Inc.'s TCR fell 1.7 from 2.4 in 2016 to 0.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 2.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.52× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.4 · 2017=1.9 · 2020=0.6 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=2.3 · 2023=1.6 · 2024=0.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238210 · Bowling Green, OH AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.4 · 49% of ind

  • DART 0.7 DART
  • RANK #76/218
  • PHOTO KOBO Utility Constru…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 14 inj
  • SIZE ~125 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: KOBO Utility Construction Corporation (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Lake Erie Electric of Toledo, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Lake Erie Electric of Toledo, Inc. averages 1.4 TCR (49% of the Electrical contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Lake Erie Electric of Toledo, Inc. TCR series: 2016=2.4 · 2017=1.9 · 2020=0.6 · 2021=0 · 2022=2.3 · 2023=1.6 · 2024=0.7 · BLS 2.8

Where Lake Erie Electric of Toledo, Inc. falls in its industry

4,550 Electrical contractors establishments

Safer than 72% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #76 safest of 218 Electrical contractors employers in Ohio.

Lake Erie Electric of Toledo, Inc. (125 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Lake Erie Electric of Toledo, Inc.
Lake Erie Electric of Toledo, Inc. (125 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Lake Erie Electric of Toledo, Inc. has more employees than the Electrical contractors median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.7 0.7 1 0 0
2023 1.6 0.8 2 0 0
2022 2.3 0.0 2 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.6 0.0 1 0 0
2017 1.9 0.0 4 0 0
2016 2.4 1.2 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238210 · OH · Bowling Green

4,550 Electrical contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 98 employers in Bowling Green, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR KOBO Utility Construction Corporation 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Thunder Electrical Contractors Inc 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR 3804_7227 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR 4621_10354 1.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE AKRON - WILBETH SHOP 125 FTE
STATE-SIZE Atlas Steel 125 FTE
STATE-SIZE Taylor Tele-Communications, Inc. 125 FTE
STATE-SIZE Vertiv Corporation - Lorain 125 FTE
CITY-NEAR Vehtek Systems Inc 856 FTE
CITY-NEAR Wood County Hospital 760 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1913 371 FTE
CITY-NEAR TH Plastics - Bowling Green 333 FTE
NAT-TCR Action Equip. & Scaffold C., Inc. 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Continental Disc Corporation 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Doan Building 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Tonnard Manufacturing Corp 1.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Recovery Village at Palmer Lake 125 FTE
NAT-SIZE Nekoosa Coated Products (NCP) 125 FTE
NAT-SIZE Metairie Healthcare Center 125 FTE
NAT-SIZE Delta Air Lines - MS4 125 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.