Pressure control valves (except fluid power), industrial-type, manufacturing · Missouri

Continental Disc Corporation

Liberty, MO · ~197 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Continental Disc Corporation runs at 42% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Pressure control valves (except fluid power), industrial-type, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Continental Disc Corporation: 1.4 TCR = 42% of Pressure control valves (except fluid power), industrial-type, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Continental Disc Corporation safety composite

Continental Disc Corporation scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

66/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.37 per 100 workers

Safer than 65% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.4

2016→2024

Continental Disc Corporation injury rate improved

Continental Disc Corporation's TCR fell 0.4 from 2.0 in 2016 to 1.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 2.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.0 · 2019=0.9 · 2020=1.1 · 2022=1.6 · 2023=1.0 · 2024=1.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332911 · Liberty, MO AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.4 · 42% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #2/7
  • PHOTO Gemu Valves, Inc.
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 16 inj
  • SIZE ~197 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Gemu Valves, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Missouri employers → · Look up another →

Continental Disc Corporation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Continental Disc Corporation averages 1.4 TCR (42% of the Pressure control valves (except fluid power), industrial-type, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Continental Disc Corporation TCR series: 2016=2 · 2019=0.9 · 2020=1.1 · 2022=1.6 · 2023=1 · 2024=1.6 · BLS 3.3

Where Continental Disc Corporation falls in its industry

298 Pressure control valves (excep establishments

Safer than 65% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Missouri alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 7 Pressure control valves (excep employers in Missouri.

Continental Disc Corporation (197 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Continental Disc Corporation
Continental Disc Corporation (197 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 2.0

Continental Disc Corporation has more employees than the Pressure control valves (except fluid po median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.6 0.0 3 0 0
2023 1.0 1.0 2 0 0
2022 1.6 0.0 3 0 0
2020 1.1 0.5 2 0 0
2019 0.9 0.5 2 0 0
2016 2.0 1.5 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332911 · MO · Liberty

298 Pressure control valves (except fluid power), industrial-type, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,075 rated employers in Missouri with headcount on file · 66 employers in Liberty, MO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Gemu Valves, Inc. 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR GC Valves 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Groth Corporation 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fluid Connectors : Mauston 1.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Concordia Plant 197 FTE
STATE-SIZE Distribution Management Inc. HQ 197 FTE
STATE-SIZE 272 RICHMOND CTR 197 FTE
STATE-SIZE WM 145 197 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hallmark Cards Liberty Distribution Center (& LDC 2) 1,521 FTE
CITY-NEAR Liberty Distribution 1,389 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - MCI9 1,370 FTE
CITY-NEAR LMV Automotive Systems 689 FTE
NAT-TCR Lake Erie Electric of Toledo, Inc. 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Action Equip. & Scaffold C., Inc. 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Doan Building 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Tonnard Manufacturing Corp 1.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE D Guerra Construction, LLC 197 FTE
NAT-SIZE 1443 - Philadelphia Snyder Ave 197 FTE
NAT-SIZE Amazon.com Services LLC - DRT7 197 FTE
NAT-SIZE Recovery Centers of America at Raritan Bay 197 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.