Long Term Care Facility · South Carolina

Lake Moultrie Nursing Facility - 006

St. Stephen, SC · ~117 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
6.0
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Lake Moultrie Nursing Facility - 006 runs at 92% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Long Term Care Facility workplace, earning a grade C.

Lake Moultrie Nursing Facility - 006: 6.0 TCR = 92% of Long Term Care Facility BLS 6.5 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Lake Moultrie Nursing Facility - 006 safety composite

Lake Moultrie Nursing Facility - 006 scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 56% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 23%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

43/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 5.95 per 100 workers

Safer than 56% of industry peers

DART rate
F 7.61 per 100 workers

Safer than 23% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Lake Moultrie Nursing Facility - 006: 1.2 → 701.8 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 701.8 TCR · DART/TCR 117.94× in 2024

Lake Moultrie Nursing Facility - 006's TCR rose 700.6 from 1.2 in 2017 to 701.8 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 117.94× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · St. Stephen, SC AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 6.0 · 92% of ind

  • DART 701.8 DART
  • RANK #88/165
  • PHOTO Karesh at Beechwood
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 43 inj
  • SIZE ~117 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Karesh at Beechwood (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Lake Moultrie Nursing Facility - 006 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Lake Moultrie Nursing Facility - 006 averages 6.0 TCR (92% of the Long Term Care Facility BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Lake Moultrie Nursing Facility - 006 TCR series: 2017=1.2 · 2018=0 · 2019=5.5 · 2020=8.4 · 2021=10.5 · 2022=8.4 · 2023=7.6 · 2024=701.8 · BLS 6.5

Where Lake Moultrie Nursing Facility - 006 falls in its industry

15,252 Long Term Care Facility establishments

Safer than 56% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #88 safest of 165 Long Term Care Facility employers in South Carolina.

Lake Moultrie Nursing Facility - 006 (117 employees, TCR 6.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Lake Moultrie Nursing Facility - 006
Lake Moultrie Nursing Facility - 006 (117 employees, TCR 6.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Lake Moultrie Nursing Facility - 006 has more employees than the Long Term Care Facility median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 701.8 701.8 4 0 0
2023 7.6 7.6 7 0 0
2022 8.4 7.2 7 0 0
2021 10.5 9.2 8 0 0
2020 8.4 7.2 7 0 0
2019 5.5 5.5 5 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 4 0 0
2017 1.2 1.2 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · SC · St. Stephen

15,252 Long Term Care Facility employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 7 employers in St. Stephen, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Karesh at Beechwood 6.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bear Mountain 6.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR EAST LAKE NURSING & REHABILITATION 6.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Norris Square 6.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Pickens 117 FTE
STATE-SIZE Parkdale Mills, Inc. Plant 40 117 FTE
STATE-SIZE Carotell Paperboard 117 FTE
STATE-SIZE Daeyoung Electronics USA 117 FTE
CITY-NEAR Timberland High School 103 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Stephen Elementary School 69 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Stephen IGA #658 58 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Stephen Middle School 43 FTE
NAT-TCR 099/Troy 6.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Kenyon Plastering of Visalia, Inc. 6.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Mt Erie Complex -Est 6.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Danone US LLC 6.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE 130-10 Food Corp. 117 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lawrence Intermediate School 117 FTE
NAT-SIZE Webster Park Operator LLC 117 FTE
NAT-SIZE Skolnik Industries, Inc 117 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.