Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · South Carolina

Lakewood Senior Living

Name: Lakewood Senior Living Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

Boiling Springs, SC · ~117 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

D
Poor Safety Record: 4.9
Avg TCR: 3.8
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Lakewood Senior Living runs at 130% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

Lakewood Senior Living: 4.9 TCR = 130% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Lakewood Senior Living safety composite

Lakewood Senior Living scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 69% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

62/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): C 4.94 per 100 workers

Safer than 69% of industry peers
DART rate: C 1.6 per 100 workers

Safer than 63% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.7

2021→2022

Lakewood Senior Living injury rate improved

Lakewood Senior Living's TCR fell 6.7 from 8.3 in 2021 to 1.6 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2021 at 8.3 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.32× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=8.3 · 2022=1.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Boiling Springs, SC ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 4.9 · 130% of ind

DART 1.6 DART
RANK #34/107
PHOTO Currituck House
BOOK 2y book
INJ 4 inj
SIZE ~117 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Currituck House (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

This site

4.9
Currituck Hous

4.9
Matthews of Ho

4.9
2248-60019

4.9
Shad's Landing

4.9

What this shows Lakewood Senior Living averages 4.9 TCR (130% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Lakewood Senior Living TCR series: 2021=8.3 · 2022=1.6 · BLS 3.8

Where Lakewood Senior Living falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 69% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

Grade D

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #34 safest of 107 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in South Carolina.

Lakewood Senior Living (117 employees, TCR 4.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Lakewood Senior Living has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries	Illnesses	Fatalities
2022	1.6	1.6	1	0	0
2021	8.3	6.2	3	1	0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · SC · Boiling Springs

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 12 employers in Boiling Springs, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	Currituck House	MOYOCK, NC	4.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Matthews of Horicon	HORICON, WI	4.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR	2248-60019	SILVER SPRING, MD	4.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Shad's Landing	CHARLOTTE, NC	4.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE	Pickens	PICKENS	117 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Parkdale Mills, Inc. Plant 40	GRANITEVILLE	117 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Carotell Paperboard	TAYLORS	117 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Daeyoung Electronics USA	PROSPERITY	117 FTE
CITY-NEAR	WM 2806	Boiling Springs	388 FTE
CITY-NEAR	2806	Boiling Springs	367 FTE
CITY-NEAR	1986 LOWE S OF BOILING SPRINGS SC	Boiling Springs	161 FTE
CITY-NEAR	2807-1986	Boiling Springs	157 FTE
NAT-TCR	HS001	Framingham, MA	4.9 TCR
NAT-TCR	Advanced Cast Products	Meadville, PA	4.9 TCR
NAT-TCR	Matthews of Horicon	Horicon, WI	4.9 TCR
NAT-TCR	Alma Plants	Alma, WI	4.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE	Merit Contractors, LLC 2016	Antioch, IL	117 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Leviton Network Solutions - Bloomingdale	Bloomingdale, IL	117 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Rexam Beverage Can St.Paul	Saint Paul, MN	117 FTE
NAT-SIZE	3265 Family Fare (Mtn View,Rapid City,Sd)	Rapid City, SD	117 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.