Sample analysis instruments (except medical) manufacturing · Massachusetts

Lake Shore Cryotronics Woburn

Woburn, MA · ~40 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Lake Shore Cryotronics Woburn runs at 52% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Sample analysis instruments (except medical) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Lake Shore Cryotronics Woburn: 1.7 TCR = 52% of Sample analysis instruments (except medical) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Lake Shore Cryotronics Woburn safety composite

Lake Shore Cryotronics Woburn scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 75% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 35%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

53/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 1.71 per 100 workers

Safer than 35% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Lake Shore Cryotronics Woburn: 0.0 → 3.5 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 3.5 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

Lake Shore Cryotronics Woburn's TCR rose 3.5 from 0.0 in 2020 to 3.5 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334516 · Woburn, MA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.7 · 52% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #26/33
  • PHOTO Repligen Corporation…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~40 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Repligen Corporation, Marlborough (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Massachusetts employers → · Look up another →

Lake Shore Cryotronics Woburn in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Lake Shore Cryotronics Woburn averages 1.7 TCR (52% of the Sample analysis instruments (except medical) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Lake Shore Cryotronics Woburn TCR series: 2020=0 · 2021=2.6 · 2022=2.5 · 2023=0 · 2024=3.5 · BLS 3.3

Where Lake Shore Cryotronics Woburn falls in its industry

213 Sample analysis instruments (e establishments

Safer than 35% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Massachusetts alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #26 safest of 33 Sample analysis instruments (e employers in Massachusetts.

Lake Shore Cryotronics Woburn (40 employees, TCR 1.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 133 employees and a TCR of 1.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Lake Shore Cryotronics Woburn
Lake Shore Cryotronics Woburn (40 employees, TCR 1.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 133 employees and a TCR of 1.2

Lake Shore Cryotronics Woburn has fewer employees than the Sample analysis instruments (except medi median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.5 0.0 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 2.5 0.0 1 0 0
2021 2.6 2.6 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334516 · MA · Woburn

213 Sample analysis instruments (except medical) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,108 rated employers in Massachusetts with headcount on file · 187 employers in Woburn, MA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Repligen Corporation, Marlborough 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bothell, WA (BID) 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Parr Instrument Company 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Shimadzu Scientific Instruments, Inc. - Mid Atlantic Region 1.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Eversource - Hyde Park Gas 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE Springfield, MA 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dacon Corporation 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE Herzog Contracting Corp. - GLX Constructors 40 FTE
CITY-NEAR Raytheon_Woburn_MA 1,364 FTE
CITY-NEAR Marshalls Woburn Merchants, Inc 1,044 FTE
CITY-NEAR Woburn Marshalls Distribution Center 1,029 FTE
CITY-NEAR GEI Consultants, Inc. 837 FTE
NAT-TCR Los Lunas (Onsite Walmart) 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Leppinks Dorr 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Schutz Container Systems 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Ortho Development Corporation 1.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE American Champion Aircraft Corp 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE Davis Manufacturing and Packaging, Inc 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE Eagle Manufacturing Co., Inc. 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE Adams Outdoor Advertising 40 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.