Packaging, plastics (e.g., blister, bubble), manufacturing · North Carolina

Schutz Container Systems

Lexington, NC · ~69 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Schutz Container Systems runs at 52% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Packaging, plastics (e.g., blister, bubble), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Schutz Container Systems: 1.7 TCR = 52% of Packaging, plastics (e.g., blister, bubble), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Schutz Container Systems safety composite

Schutz Container Systems scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

75/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.71 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.5

2020→2024

Schutz Container Systems injury rate improved

Schutz Container Systems's TCR fell 2.5 from 4.0 in 2020 to 1.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 4.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=4.0 · 2021=1.6 · 2022=1.5 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=1.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326199 · Lexington, NC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.7 · 52% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #35/132
  • PHOTO 4742_10800
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~69 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 4742_10800 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Schutz Container Systems in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Schutz Container Systems averages 1.7 TCR (52% of the Packaging, plastics (e.g., blister, bubble), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Schutz Container Systems TCR series: 2020=4 · 2021=1.6 · 2022=1.5 · 2023=0 · 2024=1.4 · BLS 3.3

Where Schutz Container Systems falls in its industry

2,838 Packaging, plastics (e.g., bli establishments

Safer than 80% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #35 safest of 132 Packaging, plastics (e.g., bli employers in North Carolina.

Schutz Container Systems (69 employees, TCR 1.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 101 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Schutz Container Systems
Schutz Container Systems (69 employees, TCR 1.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 101 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Schutz Container Systems has fewer employees than the Packaging, plastics (e.g., blister, bubb median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.4 0.0 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 1.5 0.0 1 0 0
2021 1.6 0.0 1 0 0
2020 4.0 1.3 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326199 · NC · Lexington

2,838 Packaging, plastics (e.g., blister, bubble), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 120 employers in Lexington, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 4742_10800 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR MTNA-Greenville Plant 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sterling Manufacturing Co 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Armorcore 1.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE APEX OPERATIONS 69 FTE
STATE-SIZE SOUTH RALEIGH OPERATIONS 69 FTE
STATE-SIZE Brunswick Regional Water & Sewer H2GO 69 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lendlease - Charlotte Office 69 FTE
CITY-NEAR Davidson County Schools 3,351 FTE
CITY-NEAR Davidson County Government 1,237 FTE
CITY-NEAR Atrium Windows & Door 910 FTE
CITY-NEAR ASCO Power Technologies 639 FTE
NAT-TCR Ortho Development Corporation 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR 60532 Capstone - Sysco College Park Ga 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Lake Shore Cryotronics Woburn 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Los Lunas (Onsite Walmart) 1.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Craneworks, Inc - Bham 69 FTE
NAT-SIZE Focused Care at Center 69 FTE
NAT-SIZE Focused Care at Mt Pleasant 69 FTE
NAT-SIZE Nutrien 69 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.