Intermediate care facilities, intellectual and developmental disability · Florida

Lake View Court

Orlando, FL · ~82 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.7
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Lake View Court runs at 281% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Intermediate care facilities, intellectual and developmental disability workplace, earning a grade F.

Lake View Court: 10.7 TCR = 281% of Intermediate care facilities, intellectual and developmental disability BLS 3.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Lake View Court safety composite

Lake View Court scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 11%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

25/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.69 per 100 workers

Safer than 22% of industry peers

DART rate
F 11.17 per 100 workers

Safer than 11% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Lake View Court: 3.0 → 11.2 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 29.1 TCR · DART/TCR 1.04× in 2022

Lake View Court's TCR rose 8.2 from 3.0 in 2016 to 11.2 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2020 at 29.1 TCR. In 2022, DART was 1.04× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623210 · Orlando, FL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 10.7 · 281% of ind

  • DART 11.2 DART
  • RANK #69/92
  • PHOTO 37-39 Adams Drive, R…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 37 inj
  • SIZE ~82 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 37-39 Adams Drive, Randolph, MA 02368 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Lake View Court in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Lake View Court averages 10.7 TCR (281% of the Intermediate care facilities, intellectual and developmental disability BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Lake View Court TCR series: 2016=3 · 2017=9.7 · 2018=7.8 · 2019=8.6 · 2020=29.1 · 2021=5.5 · 2022=11.2 · BLS 3.8

Where Lake View Court falls in its industry

2,261 Intermediate care facilities, establishments

Safer than 22% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #69 safest of 92 Intermediate care facilities, employers in Florida.

Lake View Court (82 employees, TCR 10.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 5.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Lake View Court
Lake View Court (82 employees, TCR 10.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 5.8

Lake View Court has more employees than the Intermediate care facilities, intellectu median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 11.2 11.2 4 6 0
2021 5.5 3.3 4 1 0
2020 29.1 29.1 2 26 0
2019 8.6 6.4 8 0 0
2018 7.8 7.8 7 0 0
2017 9.7 8.6 9 0 0
2016 3.0 2.0 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623210 · FL · Orlando

2,261 Intermediate care facilities, intellectual and developmental disability employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 1,997 employers in Orlando, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 37-39 Adams Drive, Randolph, MA 02368 10.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Teater House 10.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Case Management DD 5A 10.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Liberty Residential - 40 Ridge Rd. 10.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Trilby 82 FTE
STATE-SIZE PTF-Turkey Point Plant Fossil 82 FTE
STATE-SIZE Polk Power Station 82 FTE
STATE-SIZE Jamestown Complex 82 FTE
CITY-NEAR Universal Orlando Resort 20,343 FTE
CITY-NEAR Universal Parks and Resorts : UO 13,442 FTE
CITY-NEAR ADVENTHEALTH ORLANDO 11,412 FTE
CITY-NEAR Florida Hospital Orlando 10,318 FTE
NAT-TCR 9277-675 Crested Butte Mtn 10.7 TCR
NAT-TCR 398341-Tul-Donaldson Sta 10.7 TCR
NAT-TCR 216786-Opelousas Po 10.7 TCR
NAT-TCR 383369-Ham-Fairfield Br 10.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE 6925-ATL 82 FTE
NAT-SIZE RenaissanceProvidence Downtown Hotel 82 FTE
NAT-SIZE Etowah Plant 82 FTE
NAT-SIZE Illinois Ni Cast LLC 82 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.