Job stampings, automotive, metal, manufacturing · Indiana

Lakepark Industries of Indiana, Inc.

Shipshewana, IN · ~158 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.0
Avg TCR
5.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Lakepark Industries of Indiana, Inc. runs at 19% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Job stampings, automotive, metal, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Lakepark Industries of Indiana, Inc.: 1.0 TCR = 19% of Job stampings, automotive, metal, manufacturing BLS 5.4 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Lakepark Industries of Indiana, Inc. safety composite

Lakepark Industries of Indiana, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 96% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

83/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 1.02 per 100 workers

Safer than 96% of industry peers

DART rate
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 90% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.5

2016→2024

Lakepark Industries of Indiana, Inc. injury rate improved

Lakepark Industries of Indiana, Inc.'s TCR fell 1.5 from 2.6 in 2016 to 1.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 2.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.6 · 2017=0.8 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.6 · 2024=1.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336370 · Shipshewana, IN AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.0 · 19% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #2/31
  • PHOTO Guyoungtech Montgome…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~158 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Guyoungtech Montgomery Plant (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Lakepark Industries of Indiana, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Lakepark Industries of Indiana, Inc. averages 1.0 TCR (19% of the Job stampings, automotive, metal, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Lakepark Industries of Indiana, Inc. TCR series: 2016=2.6 · 2017=0.8 · 2022=0 · 2023=0.6 · 2024=1.1 · BLS 5.4

Where Lakepark Industries of Indiana, Inc. falls in its industry

510 Job stampings, automotive, met establishments

Safer than 96% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 31 Job stampings, automotive, met employers in Indiana.

Lakepark Industries of Indiana, Inc. (158 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 145 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 024681012 Average employees Total Case Rate Lakepark Industries of Indiana, Inc.
Lakepark Industries of Indiana, Inc. (158 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 145 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Lakepark Industries of Indiana, Inc. has more employees than the Job stampings, automotive, metal, manufa median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.1 0.0 2 0 0
2023 0.6 0.6 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.8 0.0 1 0 0
2016 2.6 0.7 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336370 · IN · Shipshewana

510 Job stampings, automotive, metal, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 19 employers in Shipshewana, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Guyoungtech Montgomery Plant 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR GEDIA Georgia LLC 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pridgeon & Clay, Inc. USDC 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hanwha Advanced Materials America LLC. Opelika 1.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Midwestern Electric LLC 158 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kerry-Evansville 158 FTE
STATE-SIZE Jet Technologies, Inc. 158 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ottenweller Company, Inc. Fort Wayne Headquarters 158 FTE
CITY-NEAR KZ RECREATIONAL VEHICLES 662 FTE
CITY-NEAR KZ 584 FTE
CITY-NEAR Highland Ridge RV 326 FTE
CITY-NEAR Riegsecker Restaurants 192 FTE
NAT-TCR 443009-Genesee Valley | NY | SNY-520 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Ryan Fireprotection, Inc. - Louisville 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Melody Rae Motors, Inc dba Honda on Grand 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 59th and Bell 1.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Helm Electric 158 FTE
NAT-SIZE Oregon Health Investors Inc. 158 FTE
NAT-SIZE Main Office 158 FTE
NAT-SIZE Quality Electrodynamics 158 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.