Diagnostic equipment, MRI (magnetic resonance imaging), manufacturing · Ohio

Quality Electrodynamics

Mayfield Village, OH · ~158 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Quality Electrodynamics runs at 85% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Diagnostic equipment, MRI (magnetic resonance imaging), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Quality Electrodynamics: 2.8 TCR = 85% of Diagnostic equipment, MRI (magnetic resonance imaging), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Quality Electrodynamics safety composite

Quality Electrodynamics scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 16%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

47/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 2.81 per 100 workers

Safer than 16% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−18.5

2016→2024

Quality Electrodynamics injury rate improved

Quality Electrodynamics's TCR fell 18.5 from 18.5 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 18.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=18.5 · 2017=0.6 · 2018=0.6 · 2019=1.6 · 2020=1.2 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334510 · Mayfield Village, OH AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 2.8 · 85% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #8/10
  • PHOTO Lead-Lok, Inc.
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~158 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Lead-Lok, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Quality Electrodynamics in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Quality Electrodynamics averages 2.8 TCR (85% of the Diagnostic equipment, MRI (magnetic resonance imaging), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Quality Electrodynamics TCR series: 2016=18.5 · 2017=0.6 · 2018=0.6 · 2019=1.6 · 2020=1.2 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Quality Electrodynamics falls in its industry

242 Diagnostic equipment, MRI (mag establishments

Safer than 16% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 10 Diagnostic equipment, MRI (mag employers in Ohio.

Quality Electrodynamics (158 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 186 employees and a TCR of 1.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Quality Electrodynamics
Quality Electrodynamics (158 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 186 employees and a TCR of 1.1

Quality Electrodynamics has fewer employees than the Diagnostic equipment, MRI (magnetic reso median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 1.2 1.2 2 0 0
2019 1.6 0.5 3 0 0
2018 0.6 0.6 1 0 0
2017 0.6 0.6 1 0 0
2016 18.5 12.3 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334510 · OH · Mayfield Village

242 Diagnostic equipment, MRI (magnetic resonance imaging), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 13 employers in Mayfield Village, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Lead-Lok, Inc. 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR KPR U.S., LLC 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR DeVilbiss Healthcare 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brownsville 2.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Ferguson Construction Company - Sidney 158 FTE
STATE-SIZE Forest City Erectors Inc. 158 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cincinnati Crisco Plant 158 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ohio Valley Veneer 158 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rockwell Automation- Mayfield Village OH (MVI) 332 FTE
CITY-NEAR Preformed Line Products 209 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mars Electric Company 198 FTE
CITY-NEAR 10 - SOM 172 FTE
NAT-TCR EPTAM West LLC 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Whitewood Industries, Plant 1 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Hatch Stamping Company - Howell 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Transcontinental Packaging Griffin 2.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Main Office 158 FTE
NAT-SIZE Winland Foods Inc. 158 FTE
NAT-SIZE Life Care Center of Columbia 158 FTE
NAT-SIZE Keystone RV Crossroads - Plant 501 158 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.