Insulation, boiler, duct and pipe, installation · Michigan

Lakeside Mechanical Contractors

Allegan, MI · ~22 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.2
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Lakeside Mechanical Contractors runs at 42% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Insulation, boiler, duct and pipe, installation workplace, earning a grade A.

Lakeside Mechanical Contractors: 1.2 TCR = 42% of Insulation, boiler, duct and pipe, installation BLS 2.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Lakeside Mechanical Contractors safety composite

Lakeside Mechanical Contractors scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 75% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

68/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.18 per 100 workers

Safer than 72% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.7

2016→2019

Lakeside Mechanical Contractors injury rate improved

Lakeside Mechanical Contractors's TCR fell 4.7 from 4.7 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2016 at 4.7 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.7 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238290 · Allegan, MI AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.2 · 42% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #10/30
  • PHOTO TK Elevator Louisville
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~22 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: TK Elevator Louisville (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Lakeside Mechanical Contractors in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Lakeside Mechanical Contractors averages 1.2 TCR (42% of the Insulation, boiler, duct and pipe, installation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Lakeside Mechanical Contractors TCR series: 2016=4.7 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · BLS 2.8

Where Lakeside Mechanical Contractors falls in its industry

1,138 Insulation, boiler, duct and p establishments

Safer than 72% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #10 safest of 30 Insulation, boiler, duct and p employers in Michigan.

Lakeside Mechanical Contractors (22 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Lakeside Mechanical Contractors
Lakeside Mechanical Contractors (22 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 2.0

Lakeside Mechanical Contractors has fewer employees than the Insulation, boiler, duct and pipe, insta median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 4.7 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238290 · MI · Allegan

1,138 Insulation, boiler, duct and pipe, installation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 30 employers in Allegan, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR TK Elevator Louisville 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR EnPro Industrial Services, LLC 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mechanical Contractors Inc 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR TK Elevator St. Louis 1.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Skymint Silo59 Production Facility 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE PRT Brighton 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cadillac Renewable Energy 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Benzonia 22 FTE
CITY-NEAR Perrigo : Michigan-Allegan (PMI) 3,500 FTE
CITY-NEAR Allegan County 454 FTE
CITY-NEAR ALLI - Allegan 230 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1855-MIKAL64 151 FTE
NAT-TCR Alside Supply Center #153 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Cargill Animal Nutrition 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Alliant Techsystems Operations LLC - Elkton 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Pierceton - Instruments & Implants 1.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE ISS Facility Services, Hewlett Packard Fort Collins 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Goodland Elevator & Fertilizer 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Browder Veneer Company, Inc. 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lubbock 17 22 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.