Prosthetic appliances and supplies manufacturing · Indiana

Pierceton - Instruments & Implants

Pierceton, IN · ~249 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Pierceton - Instruments & Implants runs at 36% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Prosthetic appliances and supplies manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Pierceton - Instruments & Implants: 1.2 TCR = 36% of Prosthetic appliances and supplies manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Pierceton - Instruments & Implants safety composite

Pierceton - Instruments & Implants scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 71% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 33%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

52/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.18 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

DART rate
F 1.7 per 100 workers

Safer than 33% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Pierceton - Instruments & Implants: 0.8 → 2.4 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 2.4 TCR · DART/TCR 1.44× in 2019

Pierceton - Instruments & Implants's TCR rose 1.5 from 0.8 in 2016 to 2.4 in 2019. In 2019, DART was 1.44× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 339113 · Pierceton, IN AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.2 · 36% of ind

  • DART 1.7 DART
  • RANK #11/26
  • PHOTO Cirtec Medical
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~249 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Cirtec Medical (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Pierceton - Instruments & Implants in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Pierceton - Instruments & Implants averages 1.2 TCR (36% of the Prosthetic appliances and supplies manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Pierceton - Instruments & Implants TCR series: 2016=0.8 · 2017=0.7 · 2018=0.8 · 2019=2.4 · BLS 3.3

Where Pierceton - Instruments & Implants falls in its industry

555 Prosthetic appliances and supp establishments

Safer than 71% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #11 safest of 26 Prosthetic appliances and supp employers in Indiana.

Pierceton - Instruments & Implants (249 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 123 employees and a TCR of 2.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Pierceton - Instruments & Implants
Pierceton - Instruments & Implants (249 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 123 employees and a TCR of 2.1

Pierceton - Instruments & Implants has more employees than the Prosthetic appliances and supplies manuf median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 2.4 1.7 7 0 0
2018 0.8 0.4 2 0 0
2017 0.7 0.0 2 0 0
2016 0.8 0.4 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

339113 · IN · Pierceton

555 Prosthetic appliances and supplies manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 8 employers in Pierceton, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Cirtec Medical 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Musculoskeletal Transplant Foundation -Olyphant 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Micro Precision Swiss LLC 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Belleville 1.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Clarksville 25 249 FTE
STATE-SIZE Autoform Tool & Manufacturing, LLC 249 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2325 MARTINS SUPERMARKET 249 FTE
STATE-SIZE Meijer #154 249 FTE
CITY-NEAR Paragon Medical - Cases & Trays - Pierceton 312 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pierceton - Cases & Trays 288 FTE
CITY-NEAR Paragon Medical - Instruments & Implants - Pierceton 273 FTE
CITY-NEAR Midwest Roll Forming & Mfg 219 FTE
NAT-TCR Racine Campus 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Customer Solutions Center 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR GoodCents 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR The Quadrant Corporation 1.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Martin Engineering - Neponset 249 FTE
NAT-SIZE Shelbyville Distribution Center, Sanford Division 249 FTE
NAT-SIZE Chemring Ordnance, Inc. 249 FTE
NAT-SIZE Meijer Inc 191 249 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.