Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Alabama

Lakeview Estates

Birmingham, AL · ~65 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
14.4
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Lakeview Estates runs at 378% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Lakeview Estates: 14.4 TCR = 378% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Lakeview Estates safety composite

Lakeview Estates scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 14%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

48/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 14.37 per 100 workers

Safer than 14% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.5

2017→2024

Lakeview Estates injury rate improved

Lakeview Estates's TCR fell 4.5 from 4.5 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 51.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=4.5 · 2018=2.3 · 2019=4.4 · 2020=51.2 · 2021=7.3 · 2022=48.3 · 2023=33.8 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Birmingham, AL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 14.4 · 378% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #55/64
  • PHOTO Laurel Oaks
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~65 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Laurel Oaks (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Alabama employers → · Look up another →

Lakeview Estates in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Lakeview Estates averages 14.4 TCR (378% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Lakeview Estates TCR series: 2017=4.5 · 2018=2.3 · 2019=4.4 · 2020=51.2 · 2021=7.3 · 2022=48.3 · 2023=33.8 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Lakeview Estates falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 14% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Alabama alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #55 safest of 64 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Alabama.

Lakeview Estates (65 employees, TCR 14.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Lakeview Estates
Lakeview Estates (65 employees, TCR 14.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Lakeview Estates has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 33.8 30.9 1 11 0
2022 48.3 48.3 0 17 0
2021 7.3 7.3 0 1 0
2020 51.2 51.2 0 20 0
2019 4.4 4.4 2 0 0
2018 2.3 0.0 1 0 0
2017 4.5 4.5 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · AL · Birmingham

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,418 rated employers in Alabama with headcount on file · 840 employers in Birmingham, AL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Laurel Oaks 14.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ecumen Prairie Hill 14.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Gallery at Broomfield 14.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Morning View Assisted Living LLC 14.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Coosa Valley Electric Cooperative 65 FTE
STATE-SIZE North American Construction Services, LTD 65 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lambert Inc 65 FTE
STATE-SIZE Abramson 65 FTE
CITY-NEAR USD 9,165 FTE
CITY-NEAR CLASSIC FOODS 9,165 FTE
CITY-NEAR Corporate 8,650 FTE
CITY-NEAR BIRMINGHAM PACKERS 8,650 FTE
NAT-TCR Nightingale-Mount Baker Care Center 14.4 TCR
NAT-TCR ABF Freight 200 14.4 TCR
NAT-TCR A. H. Moyer, Inc. 14.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Wabre - Bremerton 14.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Glacier Raft Company 65 FTE
NAT-SIZE Williams 6 Logistics 65 FTE
NAT-SIZE Eillien's Candies Packerland 65 FTE
NAT-SIZE City of Annandale 65 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.