Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) · Texas

Williams 6 Logistics

Houston, TX · ~65 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
14.1
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Williams 6 Logistics runs at 217% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) workplace, earning a grade F.

Williams 6 Logistics: 14.1 TCR = 217% of Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) BLS 6.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Williams 6 Logistics safety composite

Williams 6 Logistics scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 71% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 16%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

44/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 14.11 per 100 workers

Safer than 16% of industry peers

DART rate
C 3.7 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Williams 6 Logistics: 9.6 → 14.8 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 17.9 TCR · DART/TCR 0.26× in 2024

Williams 6 Logistics's TCR rose 5.2 from 9.6 in 2022 to 14.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 17.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.26× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 492110 · Houston, TX ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 14.1 · 217% of ind

  • DART 3.7 DART
  • RANK #397/463
  • PHOTO CAVTV - VICTORVILLE …
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 20 inj
  • SIZE ~65 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: CAVTV - VICTORVILLE CENTER (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Williams 6 Logistics in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Williams 6 Logistics averages 14.1 TCR (217% of the Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Williams 6 Logistics TCR series: 2022=9.6 · 2023=17.9 · 2024=14.8 · BLS 6.5

Where Williams 6 Logistics falls in its industry

6,679 Courier services (i.e., interc establishments

Safer than 16% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 8.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #397 safest of 463 Courier services (i.e., interc employers in Texas.

Williams 6 Logistics (65 employees, TCR 14.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Williams 6 Logistics
Williams 6 Logistics (65 employees, TCR 14.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0

Williams 6 Logistics has fewer employees than the Courier services (i.e., intercity networ median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 8.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 14.8 3.7 8 0 0
2023 17.9 17.9 12 0 0
2022 9.6 1.9 0 5 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

492110 · TX · Houston

6,679 Courier services (i.e., intercity network) (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 5,116 employers in Houston, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR CAVTV - VICTORVILLE CENTER 14.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR PDT Inc - Main 14.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 152390000 14.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR TEBTeterboro Airport 14.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE HANSFORD COUNTY FEEDERS, LP 65 FTE
STATE-SIZE Northside Farms, LLC 65 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wilco Peanut Co. 65 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2348-Aiken, TX 65 FTE
CITY-NEAR IAH IAH 11,560 FTE
CITY-NEAR IAH - Airport United Airlines Offices 10,239 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6925-IAH 9,442 FTE
CITY-NEAR Houston Methodist Hospital Texas Medical Center 8,873 FTE
NAT-TCR Autism Learning Partners Portland 14.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Eastridge Nursing and Rehabilitation 14.1 TCR
NAT-TCR ABF Freight 162 14.1 TCR
NAT-TCR ABF Freight 416 14.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Lakeview Estates 65 FTE
NAT-SIZE Glacier Raft Company 65 FTE
NAT-SIZE Eillien's Candies Packerland 65 FTE
NAT-SIZE City of Annandale 65 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.