Executive and legislative office combinations · South Carolina

Lancaster County Government

Lancaster, SC · ~1,009 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.1
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
1
Fatality
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Lancaster County Government runs at 98% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Executive and legislative office combinations workplace, earning a grade C.

Lancaster County Government: 3.1 TCR = 98% of Executive and legislative office combinations BLS 3.2 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Lancaster County Government safety composite

Lancaster County Government scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 67% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 7%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

47/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.15 per 100 workers

Safer than 67% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.72 per 100 workers

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Fatalities
F 1

Safer than 7% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.6

2017→2024

Lancaster County Government injury rate improved

Lancaster County Government's TCR fell 3.6 from 6.2 in 2017 to 2.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 6.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.55× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=6.2 · 2018=4.3 · 2019=4.6 · 2020=0.1 · 2021=2.5 · 2022=3.5 · 2023=1.6 · 2024=2.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 921140 · Lancaster, SC AT/BELOW-IND · LARGE

Grade C · TCR 3.1 · 98% of ind

  • DART 1.7 DART
  • RANK #7/28
  • PHOTO Village of Hodgkins
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 214 inj
  • SIZE ~1,009 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Village of Hodgkins (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Lancaster County Government in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Lancaster County Government averages 3.1 TCR (98% of the Executive and legislative office combinations BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Lancaster County Government TCR series: 2017=6.2 · 2018=4.3 · 2019=4.6 · 2020=0.1 · 2021=2.5 · 2022=3.5 · 2023=1.6 · 2024=2.6 · BLS 3.2

Where Lancaster County Government falls in its industry

239 Executive and legislative offi establishments

Safer than 67% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 28 Executive and legislative offi employers in South Carolina.

Lancaster County Government (1,009 employees, TCR 3.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 282 employees and a TCR of 4.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Lancaster County Government
Lancaster County Government (1,009 employees, TCR 3.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 282 employees and a TCR of 4.8

Lancaster County Government has more employees than the Executive and legislative office combina median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.6 1.7 21 0 0
2023 1.6 1.0 12 0 0
2022 3.5 1.7 26 0 0
2021 2.5 1.4 18 0 0
2020 0.1 0.0 36 13 0
2019 4.6 2.7 32 0 0
2018 4.3 2.0 29 0 1
2017 6.2 2.8 40 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

921140 · SC · Lancaster

239 Executive and legislative office combinations employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 51 employers in Lancaster, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Village of Hodgkins 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR CENTRAL VEHICLE MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lee County Government 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR City of St. Louis 3.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Nucor Steel-Berkeley 1,003 FTE
STATE-SIZE Trident Medical Center 1,015 FTE
STATE-SIZE Catawba Nuclear 1,019 FTE
STATE-SIZE Nestle USA, Inc. 1,019 FTE
CITY-NEAR Morningside of Lancaster 1,568 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nutramax Laboratories Inc. 592 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nutramax SC1 375 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1030 370 FTE
NAT-TCR Gap Inc. - customer Experience Center in Longview 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR The Neighborhood at Madison 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Algood Food Company 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Crawford Company North 3.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE VT San Antonio Aerospace, Inc. 1,009 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mountain F. Enterprises, Inc. 1,009 FTE
NAT-SIZE OACSD 1,009 FTE
NAT-SIZE Parsec Hobart 1,009 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.