Executive and legislative office combinations · New Jersey

Central Vehicle Maintenance and Repair

North Brunswick, NJ · ~35 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.1
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Central Vehicle Maintenance and Repair runs at 96% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Executive and legislative office combinations workplace, earning a grade C.

Central Vehicle Maintenance and Repair: 3.1 TCR = 96% of Executive and legislative office combinations BLS 3.2 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Central Vehicle Maintenance and Repair safety composite

Central Vehicle Maintenance and Repair scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 67% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 7%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

43/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.06 per 100 workers

Safer than 67% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.38 per 100 workers

Safer than 7% of industry peers

Fatalities
C 0

Safer than 55% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Central Vehicle Maintenance and Repair: 2.8 → 6.4 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 6.4 TCR · DART/TCR 2.08× in 2021

Central Vehicle Maintenance and Repair's TCR rose 3.6 from 2.8 in 2019 to 6.4 in 2021. In 2021, DART was 2.08× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 921140 · North Brunswick, NJ AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.1 · 96% of ind

  • DART 6.4 DART
  • RANK #6/10
  • PHOTO City of St. Louis
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~35 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: City of St. Louis (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

Central Vehicle Maintenance and Repair in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Central Vehicle Maintenance and Repair averages 3.1 TCR (96% of the Executive and legislative office combinations BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Central Vehicle Maintenance and Repair TCR series: 2019=2.8 · 2020=0 · 2021=6.4 · BLS 3.2

Where Central Vehicle Maintenance and Repair falls in its industry

239 Executive and legislative offi establishments

Safer than 67% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 10 Executive and legislative offi employers in New Jersey.

Central Vehicle Maintenance and Repair (35 employees, TCR 3.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 282 employees and a TCR of 4.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Central Vehicle Maintenance and Repair
Central Vehicle Maintenance and Repair (35 employees, TCR 3.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 282 employees and a TCR of 4.8

Central Vehicle Maintenance and Repair has fewer employees than the Executive and legislative office combina median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 6.4 6.4 2 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 2.8 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

921140 · NJ · North Brunswick

239 Executive and legislative office combinations employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 65 employers in North Brunswick, NJ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR City of St. Louis 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Treasurer - Tax Collector 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Active Living & Parks 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lancaster County Government 3.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE New Jersey 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mc Gowan Builders, Inc. 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE JMR Construction Corp 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE RR/Michels JV -MTA Reroute ESA 35 FTE
CITY-NEAR SilverLine - North Brunswick 1,676 FTE
CITY-NEAR Silver Line Building Products LLC 1,286 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 2003 401 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2003 393 FTE
NAT-TCR Moultrie Georgia 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Patriot Armored Systems, LLC 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Metrex Research, LLC 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Vectren Corporation - Danville 3.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Covington Hauling 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Two Men and a Truck/Volusia County #0176 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE New Rhoads Transportation, Inc. 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE UGL Illinois 35 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.