Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) · South Carolina

Lancaster Health and Rehabilitation

Lancaster, SC · ~124 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
9.4
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Lancaster Health and Rehabilitation runs at 144% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) workplace, earning a grade D.

Lancaster Health and Rehabilitation: 9.4 TCR = 144% of Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) BLS 6.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Lancaster Health and Rehabilitation safety composite

Lancaster Health and Rehabilitation scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 31%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

41/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.38 per 100 workers

Safer than 31% of industry peers

DART rate
D 4.04 per 100 workers

Safer than 44% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Lancaster Health and Rehabilitation: 1.0 → 23.3 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 23.3 TCR · DART/TCR 0.43× in 2020

Lancaster Health and Rehabilitation's TCR rose 22.3 from 1.0 in 2018 to 23.3 in 2020. In 2020, DART was 0.43× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Lancaster, SC ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 9.4 · 144% of ind

  • DART 4.0 DART
  • RANK #126/165
  • PHOTO Hanover Terrace
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~124 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Hanover Terrace (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Lancaster Health and Rehabilitation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Lancaster Health and Rehabilitation averages 9.4 TCR (144% of the Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Lancaster Health and Rehabilitation TCR series: 2018=1 · 2019=3.9 · 2020=23.3 · BLS 6.5

Where Lancaster Health and Rehabilitation falls in its industry

15,252 Convalescent homes or convales establishments

Safer than 31% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #126 safest of 165 Convalescent homes or convales employers in South Carolina.

Lancaster Health and Rehabilitation (124 employees, TCR 9.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Lancaster Health and Rehabilitation
Lancaster Health and Rehabilitation (124 employees, TCR 9.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Lancaster Health and Rehabilitation has more employees than the Convalescent homes or convalescent hospi median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 23.3 4.0 4 19 0
2019 3.9 2.9 4 0 0
2018 1.0 1.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · SC · Lancaster

15,252 Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 51 employers in Lancaster, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Hanover Terrace 9.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR JG Alexander Nursing Center 9.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Four Chaplains Nursing Care Center 9.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Robings Manor RHC 9.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Clemson Elementary School 124 FTE
STATE-SIZE Standard Textile Carolina, Inc. 124 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lamar 124 FTE
STATE-SIZE Greenville Sequencing Center 124 FTE
CITY-NEAR Morningside of Lancaster 1,568 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lancaster County Government 1,009 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nutramax Laboratories Inc. 592 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nutramax SC1 375 FTE
NAT-TCR Warren Distribution SouthEast 9.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Walzem Road 9.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Nature Fresh Farms 9.4 TCR
NAT-TCR St Joseph's Bluffs 9.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE RBM 124 FTE
NAT-SIZE Big Rock Sports 124 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ace Hardware Retail Support Center (Tampa) 124 FTE
NAT-SIZE LP Calhoun, LLC 124 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.