Regional planning and development program administration · California

Land Use Services

San Bernardino, CA · ~129 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.4
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Land Use Services runs at 76% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Regional planning and development program administration workplace, earning a grade B.

Land Use Services: 2.4 TCR = 76% of Regional planning and development program administration BLS 3.2 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Land Use Services safety composite

Land Use Services scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 77% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 44%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

58/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.42 per 100 workers

Safer than 44% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.4

2017→2020

Land Use Services injury rate improved

Land Use Services's TCR fell 0.4 from 2.9 in 2017 to 2.4 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2019 at 3.4 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=2.9 · 2018=1.0 · 2019=3.4 · 2020=2.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 925120 · San Bernardino, CA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.4 · 76% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #7/14
  • PHOTO Dakota County Commun…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~129 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Dakota County Community Development Agency (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Land Use Services in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Land Use Services averages 2.4 TCR (76% of the Regional planning and development program administration BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Land Use Services TCR series: 2017=2.9 · 2018=1 · 2019=3.4 · 2020=2.4 · BLS 3.2

Where Land Use Services falls in its industry

50 Regional planning and developm establishments

Safer than 44% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 14 Regional planning and developm employers in California.

Land Use Services (129 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 73 employees and a TCR of 2.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Land Use Services
Land Use Services (129 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 73 employees and a TCR of 2.4

Land Use Services has more employees than the Regional planning and development progra median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 2.4 0.0 3 0 0
2019 3.4 0.0 3 1 0
2018 1.0 0.0 1 0 0
2017 2.9 1.9 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

925120 · CA · San Bernardino

50 Regional planning and development program administration employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 332 employers in San Bernardino, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Dakota County Community Development Agency 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR San Joaquin County Employment and Economic Development Department 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Planning & Community Development 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Community Development & Planning Commission 2.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE MIGUEL OLIVARES & SONS 129 FTE
STATE-SIZE SUPERIOR AG. 129 FTE
STATE-SIZE Manco Ag Services 129 FTE
STATE-SIZE LADWP 11791 TRUESDALE 129 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sheriff Department 3,321 FTE
CITY-NEAR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : ONT2 2,856 FTE
CITY-NEAR Transitional Assistance Department 2,824 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon Transportation Services : ONT5 2,475 FTE
NAT-TCR Scoular Salina 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Leavitt's Freight Service 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Austin Metal 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Harrison Operations 2.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Heartland of Hillsboro 129 FTE
NAT-SIZE Baylor Institute for Rehabilitation at Fort Worth 129 FTE
NAT-SIZE Inman NS 129 FTE
NAT-SIZE Amzl : Dlr1 129 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.