Industry profile · NAICS 925120

Urban planning commissions, government

Workplace injury rates across 66 OSHA-reporting establishments in this industry, 2016–2024.

66
Employers
3.0
Avg TCR
3.2
BLS benchmark
678
Injuries

The industry picture

Employers in Urban planning commissions, government average 3.0 recordable injuries per 100 workers, below the BLS national benchmark of 3.2.

3.0
avg TCR · reporting employers
3.2
BLS national benchmark
66
employers reporting
678
recordable injuries

OSHA-reporting establishments skew toward larger, higher-hazard sites, so the reporting average runs above the BLS all-establishment benchmark.

What Urban planning commissions, government Safety Data Reveals

The Urban planning commissions, government sector (NAICS 925120) encompasses 66 distinct employer establishments currently reporting to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Across this cohort, workers have logged 678 recordable injuries during the 2016–2024 reporting window, producing an industry-weighted average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 3.0 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year. Because OSHA's ITA mandates submission from establishments with 250+ employees plus all high-hazard industries at 20+ employees, this dataset represents a structural slice of U.S. workplace risk rather than a voluntary sample.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes a separate national benchmark TCR of 3.2 for this NAICS code, derived from the BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses. Comparing the two, the ITA-reported rate of 3.0 is below the BLS benchmark, a gap that typically widens when the industry contains many large, high-exposure establishments required to file ITA reports. Employers in the table below are sorted so you can see how far individual establishments deviate from both the industry average and the national benchmark.

The practical value of industry-level safety data is threefold. First, jobseekers can gauge whether a prospective employer is better or worse than its industry peers, not just absolute injury counts, which tilt toward larger payrolls. Second, insurers and workers' compensation carriers use sector TCR as a baseline for experience-modification adjustments. Third, safety professionals benchmark their own programs against the cohort median. Use the grade-sorted employer list below to identify specific establishments within Urban planning commissions, government that outperform or underperform the sector average, and click through to each record for year-by-year injury, illness, and fatality breakdowns.

Employers in this industry, by injury rate

Page 1 of 2
Employer LocationGradeAvg TCR
City of South San Francisco - Corporation Yard South San Francisco, CA F 13.6
Sandoval County Bernalillo, NM F 11.5
Town of Chapel Hill - Housing and Community Chapel Hill, NC F 8.7
Parks, Recreation, Facilities City of Wyoming Wyoming, MI F 7.8
Public Works/Maintenance Building Bettendorf, IA F 7.4
City of Decatur Decatur, IL F 7.3
Public Works - Maintenance Facility Bettendorf, IA F 6.9
City of Burbank - Community Development Dept./ Building Burbank, CA D 5.6
Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Duluth Minnesota Duluth, MN D 5.6
Northwest Tennessee Human Resource Agency 124 Weldon Drive, TN D 5.2
City of Asheville Community and Economic Development Asheville, NC D 5.1
City of Concord Planning and Neighborhood Development Concord, NC D 4.8
Village of Hinsdale Hinsdale, IL C 3.2
Yuma County Development Services Yuma, AZ C 3.0
Highways SRF Bisbee, AZ C 2.9
City Of Sacramento-Development Operations Roll-Up (210012) Sacramento, CA C 2.9
CHARLOTTESVILLE-NDS Charlottesville, VA C 2.8
Community Development Oxnard, CA C 2.8
Community Development Resource Agency Auburn, CA C 2.6
RMA Admin Visalia, CA B 2.5
Community Development & Planning Commission Charlottesville, VA B 2.5
San Joaquin County Employment and Economic Development Department Stockton, CA B 2.4
Land Use Services San Bernardino, CA B 2.4
Dakota County Community Development Agency Eagan, MN B 2.4
Planning & Community Development Suffolk, VA B 2.4
Genesee County Land Bank Authority Flint, MI B 2.2
City of Kalamazoo-Community Development Kalamazoo, MI B 2.1
City Planning Norfolk, VA B 1.9
The City of Bloomington - Community Development Bloomington, IL B 1.9
DRP Headquarters Los Angeles, CA B 1.7
Planning & Development Services San Diego, CA A 1.5
Planning and Development Services Tucson, AZ A 1.3
Metropolitan Council Regional Administration St. Paul, MN A 1.2
Community Services Board Manassas, VA A 1.2
San Joaquin County Community Development Stockton, CA A 1.0
Community Services Building Napa, CA A 1.0
Neighborhood Services Norfolk, VA A 0.9
County of Maui, Department of Planning Wailuku, HI A 0.9
Community Development Bend, OR A 0.9
Community Development Ventura, CA A 0.9
Housing Community Development Woodbridge, VA A 0.8
City of Naperville - Transportation, Engineering and Development Naperville, IL A 0.8
Community Development Corporation of Brownsville Brownsville, TX A 0.7
Cr-Community Resources Charlotte, NC A 0.7
Planning and Development Services San Diego, CA A 0.7
Community Development Department Sioux City, IA A 0.6
Development Services Buckeye, AZ A 0.6
Urban Development Salem, OR A 0.5
Community Development Hampton, VA A 0.3
Dept of Commerce -- Community Trade and Economic Development Olympia, WA A 0.1
Page 1 of 2 Next →
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Verify with BLS →

Verify with OSHA →

Working in Urban planning commissions, government?

This sector averages 3.0 against a BLS benchmark of 3.2 - but individual employers span the full A-to-F range.

Sector figures use the credible-subset mean across reporting employers; a benchmark is not any single establishment's measured rate.

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.