Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building · South Carolina

Landmark Builders of SC

Columbia, SC · ~34 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.0
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Landmark Builders of SC runs at 68% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building workplace, earning a grade B.

Landmark Builders of SC: 2.0 TCR = 68% of Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building BLS 2.9 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Landmark Builders of SC safety composite

Landmark Builders of SC scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 73% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

61/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.97 per 100 workers

Safer than 56% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Landmark Builders of SC: 0.0 → 7.9 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 7.9 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2022

Landmark Builders of SC's TCR rose 7.9 from 0.0 in 2018 to 7.9 in 2022. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236220 · Columbia, SC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.0 · 68% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #22/37
  • PHOTO Con Tech Building Sy…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~34 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Con Tech Building Systems, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Landmark Builders of SC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Landmark Builders of SC averages 2.0 TCR (68% of the Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Landmark Builders of SC TCR series: 2018=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=7.9 · BLS 2.9

Where Landmark Builders of SC falls in its industry

4,692 Addition, alteration and renov establishments

Safer than 56% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #22 safest of 37 Addition, alteration and renov employers in South Carolina.

Landmark Builders of SC (34 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Landmark Builders of SC
Landmark Builders of SC (34 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Landmark Builders of SC has fewer employees than the Addition, alteration and renovation for- median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 7.9 0.0 2 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236220 · SC · Columbia

4,692 Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 542 employers in Columbia, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Con Tech Building Systems, Inc. 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Barrick Staker Enterprise LLC 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Jamerson Lewis Construction 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Howard Building Corporation Main 2.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE TLG TURF 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE ArborGen Inc. Headquarters 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lancaster Operations Center 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Marlboro Electric Cooperative Headquarters Office 34 FTE
CITY-NEAR Palmetto Health Richland 5,949 FTE
CITY-NEAR Prisma Health Richland 4,729 FTE
CITY-NEAR South Carolina Department of Transportation 4,400 FTE
CITY-NEAR SC Department of Transportation 3,864 FTE
NAT-TCR Sams Excavating Unlimited 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Grande Juda Whey 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR RB Tool and Manufacturing 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Stop & Shop 0082 2.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE John E. Fullerton, Inc. 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE St. Joseph County Road Commission 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE 6th Generation, Inc., dba A&A Enterprises 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Uniflight 34 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.