Siding (except wood) merchant wholesalers · North Carolina

Lansing Building Products - Greensboro

Greensboro, NC · ~21 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.5
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Lansing Building Products - Greensboro runs at 115% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Siding (except wood) merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade C.

Lansing Building Products - Greensboro: 2.5 TCR = 115% of Siding (except wood) merchant wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Lansing Building Products - Greensboro safety composite

Lansing Building Products - Greensboro scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

75/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 2.52 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.0

2022→2023

Lansing Building Products - Greensboro injury rate improved

Lansing Building Products - Greensboro's TCR fell 5.0 from 5.0 in 2022 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 5.0 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=5.0 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 423330 · Greensboro, NC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 2.5 · 115% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #12/38
  • PHOTO ABC Supply 394
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~21 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: ABC Supply 394 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Lansing Building Products - Greensboro in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Lansing Building Products - Greensboro averages 2.5 TCR (115% of the Siding (except wood) merchant wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Lansing Building Products - Greensboro TCR series: 2022=5 · 2023=0 · BLS 2.2

Where Lansing Building Products - Greensboro falls in its industry

953 Siding (except wood) merchant establishments

Safer than 82% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #12 safest of 38 Siding (except wood) merchant employers in North Carolina.

Lansing Building Products - Greensboro (21 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 31 employees and a TCR of 5.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Lansing Building Products - Greensboro
Lansing Building Products - Greensboro (21 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 31 employees and a TCR of 5.7

Lansing Building Products - Greensboro has fewer employees than the Siding (except wood) merchant wholesaler median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 5.0 5.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

423330 · NC · Greensboro

953 Siding (except wood) merchant wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 920 employers in Greensboro, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR ABC Supply 394 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR A35 - Service Partners 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR 185 - DENVER BRANCH - RSG 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR EIKENHOUT - TRAVERSE CITY 2.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Timothy Yarbrough 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE Liberty NC Breeders 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE NCJA1-SEL-JASON 1' 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sunburst Trout Farms 21 FTE
CITY-NEAR MHCMH-Cone-Moses H Cone Memorial Hospital 3,806 FTE
CITY-NEAR Guilford County Local Government - All Employees 3,270 FTE
CITY-NEAR Guilford County Local Government 3,194 FTE
CITY-NEAR NCGRE - GREENSBORO HUB 2,447 FTE
NAT-TCR Big Lots Store #4400 TUCSON, AZ 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Big Lots Store #4517 WHEAT RIDGE, CO 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Big Lots Store #4680 Adrian, MI 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Mayo Clinic Health System-Pharmacy & Home Medical (Westgate) 2.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Environmental Reconditioning, Inc. 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE McCook 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pipestone 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Foutch Brothers, LLC 21 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.