Natural nonfood coloring, manufacturing · New Jersey

Lanxess Solutions US, Inc. - Fords, NJ

Fords, NJ · ~78 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Lanxess Solutions US, Inc. - Fords, NJ runs at 17% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Natural nonfood coloring, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Lanxess Solutions US, Inc. - Fords, NJ: 0.6 TCR = 17% of Natural nonfood coloring, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Lanxess Solutions US, Inc. - Fords, NJ safety composite

Lanxess Solutions US, Inc. - Fords, NJ scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 37%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

58/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.55 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.05 per 100 workers

Safer than 37% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Lanxess Solutions US, Inc. - Fords, NJ: 0.0 → 1.1 TCR

Peak year 2017 @ 1.2 TCR · DART/TCR 1.91× in 2019

Lanxess Solutions US, Inc. - Fords, NJ's TCR rose 1.1 from 0.0 in 2016 to 1.1 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2017 at 1.2 TCR. In 2019, DART was 1.91× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 325199 · Fords, NJ AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.6 · 17% of ind

  • DART 1.1 DART
  • RANK #5/16
  • PHOTO Tower
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~78 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Tower (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

Lanxess Solutions US, Inc. - Fords, NJ in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Lanxess Solutions US, Inc. - Fords, NJ averages 0.6 TCR (17% of the Natural nonfood coloring, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Lanxess Solutions US, Inc. - Fords, NJ TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=1.2 · 2018=0 · 2019=1.1 · BLS 3.3

Where Lanxess Solutions US, Inc. - Fords, NJ falls in its industry

552 Natural nonfood coloring, manu establishments

Safer than 81% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 16 Natural nonfood coloring, manu employers in New Jersey.

Lanxess Solutions US, Inc. - Fords, NJ (78 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 73 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Lanxess Solutions US, Inc. - Fords, NJ
Lanxess Solutions US, Inc. - Fords, NJ (78 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 73 employees and a TCR of 1.5

Lanxess Solutions US, Inc. - Fords, NJ has more employees than the Natural nonfood coloring, manufacturing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 1.1 1.1 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 1.2 0.0 1 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

325199 · NJ · Fords

552 Natural nonfood coloring, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 9 employers in Fords, NJ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Tower 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kemira Chemicals, Inc. Columbus Plant 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Clear Lake 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kemira Chemicals - Marietta Plant 0.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE NA-US-NJ-Egg Harbor Township-W Parkway Drive 78 FTE
STATE-SIZE Telecable Inc 78 FTE
STATE-SIZE Applied Landscape Technologies 78 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bonland Industries Inc 78 FTE
CITY-NEAR Zack Painting Co., Inc. 94 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lanxess Corporation - Fords, NJ 73 FTE
CITY-NEAR Magnolia Logistics, Inc. 64 FTE
CITY-NEAR H & H Transportation, Inc. 32 FTE
NAT-TCR Oldcastle BuildingEnvelope 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR El Paso Gridley CUSD #11 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR QualiTau, Inc, 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Tucson Electric Power (Shared Services) 0.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Indianapolis - Instruments & Implants 78 FTE
NAT-SIZE Academy Square 78 FTE
NAT-SIZE Clegg's Pest Control - Durham 78 FTE
NAT-SIZE Taylored Services, LLC 78 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.