Standards, setting and management, agencies, government · California

LASAN - Administration Division

Los Angeles, CA · ~125 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.4
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

LASAN - Administration Division runs at 75% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Standards, setting and management, agencies, government workplace, earning a grade B.

LASAN - Administration Division: 2.4 TCR = 75% of Standards, setting and management, agencies, government BLS 3.2 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

LASAN - Administration Division safety composite

LASAN - Administration Division scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 6%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

31/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.39 per 100 workers

Safer than 41% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.26 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

LASAN - Administration Division: 0.0 → 6.3 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 6.3 TCR · DART/TCR 2.62× in 2019

LASAN - Administration Division's TCR rose 6.3 from 0.0 in 2017 to 6.3 in 2019. In 2019, DART was 2.62× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 926150 · Los Angeles, CA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.4 · 75% of ind

  • DART 6.3 DART
  • RANK #4/9
  • PHOTO BSEED
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~125 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: BSEED (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

LASAN - Administration Division in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows LASAN - Administration Division averages 2.4 TCR (75% of the Standards, setting and management, agencies, government BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

LASAN - Administration Division TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=0.9 · 2019=6.3 · BLS 3.2

Where LASAN - Administration Division falls in its industry

70 Standards, setting and managem establishments

Safer than 41% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 9 Standards, setting and managem employers in California.

LASAN - Administration Division (125 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 39 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate LASAN - Administration Division
LASAN - Administration Division (125 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 39 employees and a TCR of 1.9

LASAN - Administration Division has more employees than the Standards, setting and management, agenc median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 6.3 6.3 7 0 0
2018 0.9 0.9 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

926150 · CA · Los Angeles

70 Standards, setting and management, agencies, government employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 2,064 employers in Los Angeles, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR BSEED 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Richmond Regional Office 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Buildings, Safety Engineering and Environmental Department 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Minnesota Cosmetology Examiners Board 2.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Maywood Farms 125 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bowland Vineyard Management, Inc. 125 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ventura Pacific 125 FTE
STATE-SIZE Heritage Farms LLC 125 FTE
CITY-NEAR Live Nation Worldwide, Inc. 50,317 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC Los Angeles 40,333 FTE
CITY-NEAR LADWP 11,717 FTE
CITY-NEAR Los Angeles Department of Water and Power 10,346 FTE
NAT-TCR Borden Dairy Company LLC (Conroe, TX) 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR ND,HILLSBORO - Medical Center Campus - Nursing Care Facilities (Skilled Nursing Facilities) 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR AMEREN ILLINOIS - Beardstown 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Tenet Citizens Baptist Medical 2.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Southfield Customer Center 125 FTE
NAT-SIZE 1855-MOKAN11 125 FTE
NAT-SIZE F/V Island Enterprise 125 FTE
NAT-SIZE F/V Seattle Enterprise 125 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.