Motor vehicle interior systems (e.g., headliners, panels, seats, trims) manufacturing · Michigan

Southfield Customer Center

Southfield, MI · ~125 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.8
Avg TCR
5.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Southfield Customer Center runs at 14% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Motor vehicle interior systems (e.g., headliners, panels, seats, trims) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Southfield Customer Center: 0.8 TCR = 14% of Motor vehicle interior systems (e.g., headliners, panels, seats, trims) manufacturing BLS 5.4 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Southfield Customer Center safety composite

Southfield Customer Center scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 92% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

81/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.78 per 100 workers

Safer than 92% of industry peers

DART rate
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 90% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.3

2017→2019

Southfield Customer Center injury rate improved

Southfield Customer Center's TCR fell 2.3 from 2.3 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2017 at 2.3 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=2.3 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336360 · Southfield, MI AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.8 · 14% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #16/100
  • PHOTO Hayashi Telempu Nort…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~125 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Hayashi Telempu North America MI Plant (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Southfield Customer Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Southfield Customer Center averages 0.8 TCR (14% of the Motor vehicle interior systems (e.g., headliners, panels, seats, trims) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Southfield Customer Center TCR series: 2017=2.3 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · BLS 5.4

Where Southfield Customer Center falls in its industry

384 Motor vehicle interior systems establishments

Safer than 92% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #16 safest of 100 Motor vehicle interior systems employers in Michigan.

Southfield Customer Center (125 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 245 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Southfield Customer Center
Southfield Customer Center (125 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 245 employees and a TCR of 3.3

Southfield Customer Center has fewer employees than the Motor vehicle interior systems (e.g., he median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 2.3 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336360 · MI · Southfield

384 Motor vehicle interior systems (e.g., headliners, panels, seats, trims) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 175 employers in Southfield, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Hayashi Telempu North America MI Plant 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR YFAI - Frenchtown 2 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Silicon Valley Tech Center 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR American HOWA Midway 0.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE 2552-Constantine, MI (Monsanto Co.) 125 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dan E Karn 1&2 125 FTE
STATE-SIZE PHRG DET 125 FTE
STATE-SIZE DeMaria 125 FTE
CITY-NEAR MIDET210 ASCENSION PROVIDENCE HOSP - SOUTHFIELD 2,128 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1855-MIDET210 2,027 FTE
CITY-NEAR Barton Malow Holdings, LLC 1,959 FTE
CITY-NEAR DENSO International America, inc. 1,503 FTE
NAT-TCR Supply Chain : Asheville, NC 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Sierra Recycling and Demolition 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR US Ecology Bayonne 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR US SF Florida SF 466 0.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE LASAN - Administration Division 125 FTE
NAT-SIZE 1855-MOKAN11 125 FTE
NAT-SIZE PA - Maytex/Soda Stream 125 FTE
NAT-SIZE F/V Island Enterprise 125 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.