Conservation and reclamation agencies · California

LASAN - Solid Resources Citywide Recycling Division

Los Angeles, CA · ~85 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.6
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

LASAN - Solid Resources Citywide Recycling Division runs at 48% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Conservation and reclamation agencies workplace, earning a grade A.

LASAN - Solid Resources Citywide Recycling Division: 1.6 TCR = 48% of Conservation and reclamation agencies BLS 3.2 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

LASAN - Solid Resources Citywide Recycling Division safety composite

LASAN - Solid Resources Citywide Recycling Division scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 87% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

66/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.55 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.65 per 100 workers

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

LASAN - Solid Resources Citywide Recycling Division held a steady TCR band

LASAN - Solid Resources Citywide Recycling Division's TCR held near 0.2 from 1.5 in 2017 to 1.6 in 2018. In 2018, DART was 1.06× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=1.5 · 2018=1.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 924120 · Los Angeles, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.6 · 48% of ind

  • DART 1.6 DART
  • RANK #8/96
  • PHOTO Recreation Department
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~85 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Recreation Department (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

LASAN - Solid Resources Citywide Recycling Division in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows LASAN - Solid Resources Citywide Recycling Division averages 1.6 TCR (48% of the Conservation and reclamation agencies BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

LASAN - Solid Resources Citywide Recycling Division TCR series: 2017=1.5 · 2018=1.6 · BLS 3.2

Where LASAN - Solid Resources Citywide Recycling Division falls in its industry

413 Conservation and reclamation a establishments

Safer than 87% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 96 Conservation and reclamation a employers in California.

LASAN - Solid Resources Citywide Recycling Division (85 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 5.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate LASAN - Solid Resources Citywide Recycling Division
LASAN - Solid Resources Citywide Recycling Division (85 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 5.0

LASAN - Solid Resources Citywide Recycling Division has more employees than the Conservation and reclamation agencies median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 1.6 1.6 1 0 0
2017 1.5 1.5 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

924120 · CA · Los Angeles

413 Conservation and reclamation agencies employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 2,064 employers in Los Angeles, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Recreation Department 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Dept. of Fish & Game (36) 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fernangeles RC 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Dept. of Fish & Game (27) 1.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Gallo Vineyards, Inc. 85 FTE
STATE-SIZE Roche Brothers Inc. 85 FTE
STATE-SIZE Village Nurseries Pauma Valley Yard 85 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sunlet Nursery, Inc. 85 FTE
CITY-NEAR Live Nation Worldwide, Inc. 50,317 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC Los Angeles 40,333 FTE
CITY-NEAR LADWP 11,717 FTE
CITY-NEAR Los Angeles Department of Water and Power 10,346 FTE
NAT-TCR Ripley Entertainment Inc. Corporate Headquarters 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Padgett Trucking, INC. 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR UG2 -201 - CambridgeSide 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Morgan Truck Body LLC - SWI 1.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE BMC Clinic 85 FTE
NAT-SIZE 3051 S State St 85 FTE
NAT-SIZE Plant 6D 85 FTE
NAT-SIZE Arellano Construction Company 85 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.