Law enforcement statistics centers, government · North Carolina

Law Enforcement - District 2

Mcleansville, NC · ~37 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.6
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Law Enforcement - District 2 runs at 330% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Law enforcement statistics centers, government workplace, earning a grade F.

Law Enforcement - District 2: 10.6 TCR = 330% of Law enforcement statistics centers, government BLS 3.2 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Law Enforcement - District 2 safety composite

Law Enforcement - District 2 scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 55% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 24%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

32/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.57 per 100 workers

Safer than 24% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.61 per 100 workers

Safer than 26% of industry peers

Fatalities
C 0

Safer than 55% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Law Enforcement - District 2: 8.0 → 8.4 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 15.9 TCR · DART/TCR 0.53× in 2023

Law Enforcement - District 2's TCR rose 0.4 from 8.0 in 2016 to 8.4 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2021 at 15.9 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.53× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 922190 · Mcleansville, NC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 10.6 · 330% of ind

  • DART 5.6 DART
  • RANK #11/12
  • PHOTO OFICINA MUNICIPAL DE…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 25 inj
  • SIZE ~37 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: OFICINA MUNICIPAL DE MANEJO DE EMERGENCIAS (0.8 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Law Enforcement - District 2 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Law Enforcement - District 2 averages 10.6 TCR (330% of the Law enforcement statistics centers, government BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Law Enforcement - District 2 TCR series: 2016=8 · 2017=13.1 · 2018=8.4 · 2019=9 · 2020=11 · 2021=15.9 · 2022=10.7 · 2023=8.4 · BLS 3.2

Where Law Enforcement - District 2 falls in its industry

79 Law enforcement statistics cen establishments

Safer than 24% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #11 safest of 12 Law enforcement statistics cen employers in North Carolina.

Law Enforcement - District 2 (37 employees, TCR 10.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 89 employees and a TCR of 5.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 010203040 Average employees Total Case Rate Law Enforcement - District 2
Law Enforcement - District 2 (37 employees, TCR 10.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 89 employees and a TCR of 5.3

Law Enforcement - District 2 has fewer employees than the Law enforcement statistics centers, gove median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 8.4 5.6 2 1 0
2022 10.7 5.3 3 1 0
2021 15.9 3.2 4 1 0
2020 11.0 5.5 2 2 0
2019 9.0 0.0 4 0 0
2018 8.4 8.4 3 0 0
2017 13.1 6.5 4 0 0
2016 8.0 8.0 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

922190 · NC · Mcleansville

79 Law enforcement statistics centers, government employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 6 employers in Mcleansville, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR OFICINA MUNICIPAL DE MANEJO DE EMERGENCIAS 11.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR 00001400 1400 - POLICE SERVICES DIVISION 9.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Guilford County - Emergency Medical Services 11.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2962-00001400 11.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE CAR Greenhouse LLC 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Statesville Breeders 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dan River CT/CC 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE hep Petra, LLC 37 FTE
CITY-NEAR Greensboro Distribution 778 FTE
CITY-NEAR Replacements, Ltd. 395 FTE
CITY-NEAR HNCML01 333 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ashton Health and Rehabilitation 142 FTE
NAT-TCR AWPI-Beckley 10.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Co-Ben Electric Co., LLC 10.6 TCR
NAT-TCR American Red Cross - 20 S Mount Auburn Rd 10.6 TCR
NAT-TCR IBC Engineered Materials 10.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Olympus Controls Corp. - Tualatin, OR 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE Friendship Home of Lincoln 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE Northern Bay Resort 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE Richland Office 37 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.