Bakery machinery and equipment manufacturing · California

Lawrence Equipment, Inc.

South El Monte, CA · ~315 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Lawrence Equipment, Inc. runs at 117% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Bakery machinery and equipment manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Lawrence Equipment, Inc.: 3.9 TCR = 117% of Bakery machinery and equipment manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Lawrence Equipment, Inc. safety composite

Lawrence Equipment, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 38%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

42/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.86 per 100 workers

Safer than 38% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.55 per 100 workers

Safer than 40% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.2

2018→2022

Lawrence Equipment, Inc. injury rate improved

Lawrence Equipment, Inc.'s TCR fell 2.2 from 3.7 in 2018 to 1.6 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2020 at 6.2 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.4× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=3.7 · 2019=4.9 · 2020=6.2 · 2021=2.9 · 2022=1.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333241 · South El Monte, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.9 · 117% of ind

  • DART 1.6 DART
  • RANK #6/21
  • PHOTO Marblehead Plant
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 64 inj
  • SIZE ~315 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Marblehead Plant (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Lawrence Equipment, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Lawrence Equipment, Inc. averages 3.9 TCR (117% of the Bakery machinery and equipment manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Lawrence Equipment, Inc. TCR series: 2018=3.7 · 2019=4.9 · 2020=6.2 · 2021=2.9 · 2022=1.6 · BLS 3.3

Where Lawrence Equipment, Inc. falls in its industry

215 Bakery machinery and equipment establishments

Safer than 38% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 21 Bakery machinery and equipment employers in California.

Lawrence Equipment, Inc. (315 employees, TCR 3.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 85 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Lawrence Equipment, Inc.
Lawrence Equipment, Inc. (315 employees, TCR 3.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 85 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Lawrence Equipment, Inc. has more employees than the Bakery machinery and equipment manufactu median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 1.6 1.6 7 0 0
2021 2.9 1.3 8 1 0
2020 6.2 5.5 18 0 0
2019 4.9 4.9 17 0 0
2018 3.7 3.5 14 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333241 · CA · South El Monte

215 Bakery machinery and equipment manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 26 employers in South El Monte, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Marblehead Plant 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR MP Equipment LLC 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Gold Medal Products - Cincinnati 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cantrell-Gainco Group, Inc. 3.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Live Oak Farms 315 FTE
STATE-SIZE M&J Farm Labor Contractor, Inc 315 FTE
STATE-SIZE California Department of Transportation Facility 313 315 FTE
STATE-SIZE California Department of Transportation Facility 308 315 FTE
CITY-NEAR International Medication Systems 951 FTE
CITY-NEAR Vacco INdustries 427 FTE
CITY-NEAR LAWRENCE EQUIPMENT EL MONTE 333 FTE
CITY-NEAR Halcore Group Inc. DBA Leader Industries 111 FTE
NAT-TCR Food City Store #724 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR PKW-ODFL 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR SJC Medical Group - 527 Eisenhower 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Grande Ronde Hospital 3.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Corp Grove 315 FTE
NAT-SIZE Geater Machining and Manufacturing, CO 315 FTE
NAT-SIZE Chestnut Service Center-TB 315 FTE
NAT-SIZE Reynolds Consumer Products 315 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.