Blood derivative in-vitro diagnostic substances manufacturing · Massachusetts

Lawrence facility

Lawrence, MA · ~232 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Lawrence facility runs at 64% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Blood derivative in-vitro diagnostic substances manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Lawrence facility: 2.1 TCR = 64% of Blood derivative in-vitro diagnostic substances manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Lawrence facility safety composite

Lawrence facility scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 27%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

38/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 2.1 per 100 workers

Safer than 27% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.01 per 100 workers

Safer than 42% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.3

2016→2024

Lawrence facility injury rate improved

Lawrence facility's TCR fell 2.3 from 3.4 in 2016 to 1.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 4.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.48× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.4 · 2017=0.5 · 2018=1.5 · 2019=1.3 · 2020=4.6 · 2021=2.6 · 2022=1.0 · 2023=3.0 · 2024=1.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 325413 · Lawrence, MA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.1 · 64% of ind

  • DART 1.0 DART
  • RANK #11/13
  • PHOTO Aalto Scientific, Ltd.
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 30 inj
  • SIZE ~232 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Aalto Scientific, Ltd. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Massachusetts employers → · Look up another →

Lawrence facility in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Lawrence facility averages 2.1 TCR (64% of the Blood derivative in-vitro diagnostic substances manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Lawrence facility TCR series: 2016=3.4 · 2017=0.5 · 2018=1.5 · 2019=1.3 · 2020=4.6 · 2021=2.6 · 2022=1 · 2023=3 · 2024=1 · BLS 3.3

Where Lawrence facility falls in its industry

201 Blood derivative in-vitro diag establishments

Safer than 27% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Massachusetts alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #11 safest of 13 Blood derivative in-vitro diag employers in Massachusetts.

Lawrence facility (232 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 120 employees and a TCR of 1.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,000 01234 Average employees Total Case Rate Lawrence facility
Lawrence facility (232 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 120 employees and a TCR of 1.4

Lawrence facility has more employees than the Blood derivative in-vitro diagnostic sub median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.0 1.0 2 0 0
2023 3.0 3.0 4 2 0
2022 1.0 1.0 2 0 0
2021 2.6 2.6 5 0 0
2020 4.6 3.7 3 7 0
2019 1.3 1.3 3 0 0
2018 1.5 1.5 3 0 0
2017 0.5 0.0 1 0 0
2016 3.4 2.4 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

325413 · MA · Lawrence

201 Blood derivative in-vitro diagnostic substances manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,108 rated employers in Massachusetts with headcount on file · 77 employers in Lawrence, MA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Aalto Scientific, Ltd. 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR InBios International Inc. 307 Facility 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Instrumentation Laboratory 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bionostics 2.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Capstan Atlantic 232 FTE
STATE-SIZE Jeffco Fibres, Inc. 232 FTE
STATE-SIZE 10012 Hadley 232 FTE
STATE-SIZE S05951 - WM of New England Area Office 232 FTE
CITY-NEAR LAWRENCE GENERAL HOSPITAL 1,961 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lawrence 730 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lawrence Manufacturing 728 FTE
CITY-NEAR New Balance Athletics Lawrence Mill 723 FTE
NAT-TCR 340-Des Moines 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Gold-Eagle Cooperative-Transportation 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Engineered Tools Corp. 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Rock Road Companies, Inc. 2.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE LORD Corporation - Saegertown 232 FTE
NAT-SIZE Labconco - Kansas City 232 FTE
NAT-SIZE Clampco Products, Inc. 232 FTE
NAT-SIZE Harrogate, Inc. 232 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.