Activity centers for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities · Michigan

Lawrence Home

Muskegon, MI · ~115 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.3
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Lawrence Home runs at 7% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Activity centers for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities workplace, earning a grade A.

Lawrence Home: 0.3 TCR = 7% of Activity centers for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Lawrence Home safety composite

Lawrence Home scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 98% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

80/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.25 per 100 workers

Safer than 98% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.7

2022→2024

Lawrence Home injury rate improved

Lawrence Home's TCR fell 0.7 from 0.7 in 2022 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 0.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=0.7 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 624120 · Muskegon, MI AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.3 · 7% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #2/22
  • PHOTO Dubois
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~115 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Dubois (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Lawrence Home in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Lawrence Home averages 0.3 TCR (7% of the Activity centers for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Lawrence Home TCR series: 2022=0.7 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Lawrence Home falls in its industry

1,320 Activity centers for disabled establishments

Safer than 98% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 22 Activity centers for disabled employers in Michigan.

Lawrence Home (115 employees, TCR 0.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Lawrence Home
Lawrence Home (115 employees, TCR 0.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Lawrence Home has more employees than the Activity centers for disabled persons, t median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.7 0.7 0 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

624120 · MI · Muskegon

1,320 Activity centers for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 230 employers in Muskegon, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Dubois 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ferrysburg Ottawa CLS 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ottawa PACE 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Alegre Home Health Care, LLC EL PASO 0.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Ferris Coffee & Nut Co. 115 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pumford Construction 115 FTE
STATE-SIZE PLUMBING AND HVAC 115 FTE
STATE-SIZE Advanced Food Technologies 115 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mercy Health Partners - Sherman Campus 3,461 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mercy Health Partners-1500 E Sherman BLVD-MH-MI 2,598 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mercy Health Partners - Hackley 1,329 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mercy Health Arena 861 FTE
NAT-TCR City of Roseville - City Hall 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Lodgeworks Partners 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Mactac - Stow 0.3 TCR
NAT-TCR IES Communications, LLC 0.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Park Aerospace Corp. 115 FTE
NAT-SIZE CLUES St. Paul, MN Headquarters 115 FTE
NAT-SIZE 4010 Hillsboro 115 FTE
NAT-SIZE 6328 South Chase 115 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.