Continuing care retirement communities · New Jersey

LCS Bridgewater Operations LLC/Laurel Circle

Bridgewater, NJ · ~174 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
11.0
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

LCS Bridgewater Operations LLC/Laurel Circle runs at 288% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Continuing care retirement communities workplace, earning a grade F.

LCS Bridgewater Operations LLC/Laurel Circle: 11.0 TCR = 288% of Continuing care retirement communities BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

LCS Bridgewater Operations LLC/Laurel Circle safety composite

LCS Bridgewater Operations LLC/Laurel Circle scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 25%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

35/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.96 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

DART rate
D 5.25 per 100 workers

Safer than 35% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−11.1

2022→2024

LCS Bridgewater Operations LLC/Laurel Circle injury rate improved

LCS Bridgewater Operations LLC/Laurel Circle's TCR fell 11.1 from 17.6 in 2022 to 6.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 17.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.48× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=17.6 · 2023=8.9 · 2024=6.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Bridgewater, NJ ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 11.0 · 288% of ind

  • DART 5.3 DART
  • RANK #66/92
  • PHOTO Aspired Living of La…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 16 inj
  • SIZE ~174 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Aspired Living of LaGrange (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

LCS Bridgewater Operations LLC/Laurel Circle in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows LCS Bridgewater Operations LLC/Laurel Circle averages 11.0 TCR (288% of the Continuing care retirement communities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

LCS Bridgewater Operations LLC/Laurel Circle TCR series: 2022=17.6 · 2023=8.9 · 2024=6.4 · BLS 3.8

Where LCS Bridgewater Operations LLC/Laurel Circle falls in its industry

4,127 Continuing care retirement com establishments

Safer than 25% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #66 safest of 92 Continuing care retirement com employers in New Jersey.

LCS Bridgewater Operations LLC/Laurel Circle (174 employees, TCR 11.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate LCS Bridgewater Operations LLC/Laurel Circle
LCS Bridgewater Operations LLC/Laurel Circle (174 employees, TCR 11.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

LCS Bridgewater Operations LLC/Laurel Circle has more employees than the Continuing care retirement communities median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 6.4 5.3 8 3 0
2023 8.9 8.9 5 8 0
2022 17.6 17.6 3 21 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · NJ · Bridgewater

4,127 Continuing care retirement communities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 101 employers in Bridgewater, NJ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Aspired Living of LaGrange 11.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ephrata Manor 11.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Regency at Puakea 11.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Heather Heights of Pittsford Inc. 11.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE W&H Systems Inc d.b.a. DMW&H 174 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mt. Laurel Supermarket Inc. 174 FTE
STATE-SIZE PARTNERS PHARMACY NJ 174 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2256 - South Brunswick 174 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sanofi Bridgewater Office 3,173 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sanofi Sales 2,300 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sanofi US Services Inc. 2,233 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bridgewater - Bausch Health 1,569 FTE
NAT-TCR American Red Cross - 209 Farmington Ave 11.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Oaklawn Rehabilitation Center 11.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 0298 - Ventura Main Street 11.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Hyatt Regency Seattle 11.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Nexion Inc. 174 FTE
NAT-SIZE OR-Sherwood 174 FTE
NAT-SIZE Park Center 174 FTE
NAT-SIZE Brown LLC 174 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.