Skilled nursing facilities · Minnesota

Oaklawn Rehabilitation Center

Mankato, MN · ~78 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
11.0
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Oaklawn Rehabilitation Center runs at 169% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Skilled nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

Oaklawn Rehabilitation Center: 11.0 TCR = 169% of Skilled nursing facilities BLS 6.5 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Oaklawn Rehabilitation Center safety composite

Oaklawn Rehabilitation Center scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 64% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 23%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

44/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.96 per 100 workers

Safer than 23% of industry peers

DART rate
C 2.22 per 100 workers

Safer than 64% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−10.2

2018→2024

Oaklawn Rehabilitation Center injury rate improved

Oaklawn Rehabilitation Center's TCR fell 10.2 from 14.6 in 2018 to 4.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 28.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.2× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=14.6 · 2019=28.4 · 2021=6.8 · 2022=11.5 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=4.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Mankato, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 11.0 · 169% of ind

  • DART 2.2 DART
  • RANK #295/430
  • PHOTO Saint Joseph Living …
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 33 inj
  • SIZE ~78 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Saint Joseph Living Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Oaklawn Rehabilitation Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Oaklawn Rehabilitation Center averages 11.0 TCR (169% of the Skilled nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Oaklawn Rehabilitation Center TCR series: 2018=14.6 · 2019=28.4 · 2021=6.8 · 2022=11.5 · 2023=0 · 2024=4.5 · BLS 6.5

Where Oaklawn Rehabilitation Center falls in its industry

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities establishments

Safer than 23% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #295 safest of 430 Skilled nursing facilities employers in Minnesota.

Oaklawn Rehabilitation Center (78 employees, TCR 11.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Oaklawn Rehabilitation Center
Oaklawn Rehabilitation Center (78 employees, TCR 11.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Oaklawn Rehabilitation Center has fewer employees than the Skilled nursing facilities median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.5 2.2 2 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 11.5 11.5 5 0 0
2021 6.8 0.0 3 0 0
2019 28.4 6.7 14 3 0
2018 14.6 6.5 9 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · MN · Mankato

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 214 employers in Mankato, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Saint Joseph Living Center 11.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Carvalho Grove Health & Rehab Center 11.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pond Home 11.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sudbury Pines Extended Care Facility Inc. 11.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Austin Utilities 78 FTE
STATE-SIZE Highline Construction, Inc. 78 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wireless - Wanamingo, MN 78 FTE
STATE-SIZE Prestige Drywall inc. 78 FTE
CITY-NEAR Minnesota State University, Mankato 2,729 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mayo Clinic Health System-Mankato 2,468 FTE
CITY-NEAR MRCI - Premier Drive 1,641 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mankato Area Public Schools 1,200 FTE
NAT-TCR American Red Cross - 209 Farmington Ave 11.0 TCR
NAT-TCR LCS Bridgewater Operations LLC/Laurel Circle 11.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 0298 - Ventura Main Street 11.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Carvana Delanco 11.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Basin Material Handling-Indiana 78 FTE
NAT-SIZE Oregon Harvesting Inc 78 FTE
NAT-SIZE Perficut Des Moines 78 FTE
NAT-SIZE BlueTriton High Springs - Production 78 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.