Elastomers, synthetic rubber, manufacturing · Texas

LCY Elastomers LP

Baytown, TX · ~81 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

LCY Elastomers LP runs at 62% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Elastomers, synthetic rubber, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

LCY Elastomers LP: 2.0 TCR = 62% of Elastomers, synthetic rubber, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

LCY Elastomers LP safety composite

LCY Elastomers LP scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 64% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

58/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.04 per 100 workers

Safer than 64% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.14 per 100 workers

Safer than 56% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.0

2016→2024

LCY Elastomers LP injury rate improved

LCY Elastomers LP's TCR fell 1.0 from 2.2 in 2016 to 1.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 3.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.56× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.2 · 2017=1.2 · 2018=1.2 · 2019=1.1 · 2020=3.4 · 2021=2.3 · 2022=3.4 · 2023=2.4 · 2024=1.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 325212 · Baytown, TX AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.0 · 62% of ind

  • DART 1.1 DART
  • RANK #8/13
  • PHOTO Stockwell Elastomerics
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 15 inj
  • SIZE ~81 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Stockwell Elastomerics (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

LCY Elastomers LP in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows LCY Elastomers LP averages 2.0 TCR (62% of the Elastomers, synthetic rubber, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

LCY Elastomers LP TCR series: 2016=2.2 · 2017=1.2 · 2018=1.2 · 2019=1.1 · 2020=3.4 · 2021=2.3 · 2022=3.4 · 2023=2.4 · 2024=1.1 · BLS 3.3

Where LCY Elastomers LP falls in its industry

90 Elastomers, synthetic rubber, establishments

Safer than 64% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 13 Elastomers, synthetic rubber, employers in Texas.

LCY Elastomers LP (81 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 85 employees and a TCR of 2.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate LCY Elastomers LP
LCY Elastomers LP (81 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 85 employees and a TCR of 2.8

LCY Elastomers LP has fewer employees than the Elastomers, synthetic rubber, manufactur median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.1 1.1 1 0 0
2023 2.4 1.2 2 0 0
2022 3.4 3.4 3 0 0
2021 2.3 1.2 2 0 0
2020 3.4 0.0 3 0 0
2019 1.1 0.0 1 0 0
2018 1.2 0.0 1 0 0
2017 1.2 1.2 1 0 0
2016 2.2 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

325212 · TX · Baytown

90 Elastomers, synthetic rubber, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 247 employers in Baytown, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Stockwell Elastomerics 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR HEXPOL Akron 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR American Synthetic Rubber COmpany 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Drewett Operations dba Marine Urathane 2.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Kraken Oil & Gas 81 FTE
STATE-SIZE Total Frac Solutions 81 FTE
STATE-SIZE ARLINGTON SERVICE CENTER 81 FTE
STATE-SIZE Karnes Electric Cooperative, Inc. 81 FTE
CITY-NEAR North American Growth Olefins Recovery Project 2,988 FTE
CITY-NEAR Houston Methodist Baytown Hospital 1,920 FTE
CITY-NEAR ExxonMobil Baytown Refinery 1,328 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 7042 1,288 FTE
NAT-TCR S03906 - Outer Loop RDF 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR City of Albany Library-Main 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Central Plaza Home 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Little Falls Workforce Center 2.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE FXI, Inc. - Miami 81 FTE
NAT-SIZE Trader Joe's 0237 Los Angeles 81 FTE
NAT-SIZE Trader Joe's 0216 Chino Hills 81 FTE
NAT-SIZE Trader Joe's 0180 Clovis 81 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.