Aircraft engine and engine parts (except carburetors, pistons, piston rings, valves) manufacturing · Indiana

L&E Engineering

Greenwood, IN · ~74 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

L&E Engineering runs at 49% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Aircraft engine and engine parts (except carburetors, pistons, piston rings, valves) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

L&E Engineering: 1.6 TCR = 49% of Aircraft engine and engine parts (except carburetors, pistons, piston rings, valves) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

L&E Engineering safety composite

L&E Engineering scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 48%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

60/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 1.62 per 100 workers

Safer than 48% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

L&E Engineering held a steady TCR band

L&E Engineering's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2019 at 3.9 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=0.0 · 2018=3.0 · 2019=3.9 · 2020=2.9 · 2021=0.0 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336412 · Greenwood, IN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.6 · 49% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #15/24
  • PHOTO Andrews Laser Works
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~74 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Andrews Laser Works (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

L&E Engineering in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows L&E Engineering averages 1.6 TCR (49% of the Aircraft engine and engine parts (except carburetors, pistons, piston rings, valves) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

L&E Engineering TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=3 · 2019=3.9 · 2020=2.9 · 2021=0 · 2023=0 · BLS 3.3

Where L&E Engineering falls in its industry

366 Aircraft engine and engine par establishments

Safer than 48% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #15 safest of 24 Aircraft engine and engine par employers in Indiana.

L&E Engineering (74 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 155 employees and a TCR of 1.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,0008,000 012345 Average employees Total Case Rate L&E Engineering
L&E Engineering (74 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 155 employees and a TCR of 1.6

L&E Engineering has fewer employees than the Aircraft engine and engine parts (except median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 2.9 1.4 2 0 0
2019 3.9 2.9 2 2 0
2018 3.0 2.0 3 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336412 · IN · Greenwood

366 Aircraft engine and engine parts (except carburetors, pistons, piston rings, valves) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 168 employers in Greenwood, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Andrews Laser Works 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Supply Chain : Auburn, AL 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR ATI Forged Products - East Hartford Operations 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Supply Chain : Terre Haute, IN 1.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Homestead Main 74 FTE
STATE-SIZE 6678_15543 74 FTE
STATE-SIZE Southeastern Indiana REMC 74 FTE
STATE-SIZE DJ Construction 74 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - IND9 2,588 FTE
CITY-NEAR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : IND9 2,586 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ulta Beauty GWD 850 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ulta Beauty 715 FTE
NAT-TCR Vernal, UT 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Es Wheaton All Sa 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR US Tire Recycling Partners, LP 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR RPM Transportation 1.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE John Tillman Company (DBA Tillman Compton) 74 FTE
NAT-SIZE Moorhead Courtyard 74 FTE
NAT-SIZE Grosfillex 74 FTE
NAT-SIZE Apollo Inc. 74 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.