Telecommunications equipment and wiring (except transmission line) installation contractors · California

Leaf Communications

San Clemente, CA · ~61 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.8
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Leaf Communications runs at 65% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Telecommunications equipment and wiring (except transmission line) installation contractors workplace, earning a grade B.

Leaf Communications: 1.8 TCR = 65% of Telecommunications equipment and wiring (except transmission line) installation contractors BLS 2.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Leaf Communications safety composite

Leaf Communications scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 62% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 40%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

52/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.81 per 100 workers

Safer than 62% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.3 per 100 workers

Safer than 40% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.0

2018→2022

Leaf Communications injury rate improved

Leaf Communications's TCR fell 3.0 from 4.3 in 2018 to 1.3 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2018 at 4.3 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.72× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=4.3 · 2019=2.4 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=1.1 · 2022=1.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238210 · San Clemente, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.8 · 65% of ind

  • DART 1.3 DART
  • RANK #174/548
  • PHOTO Broadway Electric Inc.
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~61 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Broadway Electric Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Leaf Communications in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Leaf Communications averages 1.8 TCR (65% of the Telecommunications equipment and wiring (except transmission line) installation contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Leaf Communications TCR series: 2018=4.3 · 2019=2.4 · 2020=0 · 2021=1.1 · 2022=1.3 · BLS 2.8

Where Leaf Communications falls in its industry

4,550 Telecommunications equipment a establishments

Safer than 62% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #174 safest of 548 Telecommunications equipment a employers in California.

Leaf Communications (61 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Leaf Communications
Leaf Communications (61 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Leaf Communications has fewer employees than the Telecommunications equipment and wiring median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 1.3 1.3 1 0 0
2021 1.1 1.1 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 2.4 0.0 2 0 0
2018 4.3 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238210 · CA · San Clemente

4,550 Telecommunications equipment and wiring (except transmission line) installation contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 69 employers in San Clemente, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Broadway Electric Inc. 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Egan Company 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Santa Maria Electric, Inc. 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Summit Electric & Data, Inc. 1.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Silveira Farms 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE La Brucherie Produce, LLC 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE Olds Ranch 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE 1750 Production Office 61 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bemus Landscape Inc. 463 FTE
CITY-NEAR Glaukos- San Clemente 314 FTE
CITY-NEAR City of San Clemente 305 FTE
CITY-NEAR Millennium Reinforcing 238 FTE
NAT-TCR Spaulding North Shore 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR ISD 284 Wayzata Schools Kimberly Lane Elementary 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 1473 - Greer 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 652 - North Glendale 1.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE 32-Emcaz-Santan Vw 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE Karlstad Healthcare Center 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE HG189 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE Automatic TLC/CRC 61 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.