Automotive supplier · Michigan

Lear Corporation - Building 100

Southfield, MI · ~486 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.1
Avg TCR
5.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Lear Corporation - Building 100 runs at 1% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Automotive supplier workplace, earning a grade A.

Lear Corporation - Building 100: 0.1 TCR = 1% of Automotive supplier BLS 5.4 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Lear Corporation - Building 100 safety composite

Lear Corporation - Building 100 scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 99% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

82/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.06 per 100 workers

Safer than 99% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Lear Corporation - Building 100 held a steady TCR band

Lear Corporation - Building 100's TCR held near 0.1 from 0.1 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 0.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.1 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.2 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.2 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336320 · Southfield, MI AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.1 · 1% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/36
  • PHOTO North American Light…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~486 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: North American Lighting - Farmington Hills Plant (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Lear Corporation - Building 100 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Lear Corporation - Building 100 averages 0.1 TCR (1% of the Automotive supplier BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Lear Corporation - Building 100 TCR series: 2016=0.1 · 2018=0 · 2019=0.2 · 2020=0 · 2021=0.2 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 5.4

Where Lear Corporation - Building 100 falls in its industry

216 Automotive supplier establishments

Safer than 99% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 36 Automotive supplier employers in Michigan.

Lear Corporation - Building 100 (486 employees, TCR 0.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 162 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Lear Corporation - Building 100
Lear Corporation - Building 100 (486 employees, TCR 0.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 162 employees and a TCR of 1.9

Lear Corporation - Building 100 has more employees than the Automotive supplier median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.2 0.2 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.2 0.0 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.1 0.0 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336320 · MI · Southfield

216 Automotive supplier employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 175 employers in Southfield, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR North American Lighting - Farmington Hills Plant 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Retro Manufacturing 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR NAL TECHNICAL CENTER 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tenneco (Federal Mogul, LLC.) 0.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE US MI Zeeland 58 Riley St 485 FTE
STATE-SIZE B04V 487 FTE
STATE-SIZE Van Andel Research Institute 485 FTE
STATE-SIZE OSF St Francis Hospital 487 FTE
CITY-NEAR MIDET210 ASCENSION PROVIDENCE HOSP - SOUTHFIELD 2,128 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1855-MIDET210 2,027 FTE
CITY-NEAR Barton Malow Holdings, LLC 1,959 FTE
CITY-NEAR DENSO International America, inc. 1,503 FTE
NAT-TCR TCCo-SoCal 0.1 TCR
NAT-TCR DeRoyal Corporate/Sales 0.1 TCR
NAT-TCR First Solar Tempe Office 0.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Continental Automotive Systems Deer Park, IL 0.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Oceaneering International - Advanced Technologies Hanover 486 FTE
NAT-SIZE Scalamandre Construction 486 FTE
NAT-SIZE Iowa State Penitentiary 486 FTE
NAT-SIZE Saint Augustine 486 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.