Global Product Development · Michigan

Lear Corporation - Building 500

Southfield, MI · ~130 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.7
Avg TCR
5.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Lear Corporation - Building 500 runs at 12% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Global Product Development workplace, earning a grade A.

Lear Corporation - Building 500: 0.7 TCR = 12% of Global Product Development BLS 5.4 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Lear Corporation - Building 500 safety composite

Lear Corporation - Building 500 scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 93% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

81/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.67 per 100 workers

Safer than 93% of industry peers

DART rate
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 90% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Lear Corporation - Building 500 held a steady TCR band

Lear Corporation - Building 500's TCR held near 0.3 from 1.0 in 2016 to 0.8 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2016 at 1.0 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.0 · 2018=0.6 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.8 · 2021=0.8 · 2022=0.7 · 2023=0.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336360 · Southfield, MI AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.7 · 12% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #14/100
  • PHOTO Trident - Manufactur…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~130 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Trident - Manufacturing (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Lear Corporation - Building 500 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Lear Corporation - Building 500 averages 0.7 TCR (12% of the Global Product Development BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Lear Corporation - Building 500 TCR series: 2016=1 · 2018=0.6 · 2019=0 · 2020=0.8 · 2021=0.8 · 2022=0.7 · 2023=0.8 · BLS 5.4

Where Lear Corporation - Building 500 falls in its industry

384 Global Product Development establishments

Safer than 93% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #14 safest of 100 Global Product Development employers in Michigan.

Lear Corporation - Building 500 (130 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 245 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Lear Corporation - Building 500
Lear Corporation - Building 500 (130 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 245 employees and a TCR of 3.3

Lear Corporation - Building 500 has fewer employees than the Global Product Development median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.8 0.0 1 0 0
2022 0.7 0.0 1 0 0
2021 0.8 0.0 1 0 0
2020 0.8 0.8 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.6 0.0 1 0 0
2016 1.0 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336360 · MI · Southfield

384 Global Product Development employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 175 employers in Southfield, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Trident - Manufacturing 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kasai North America, Inc. - Talladega, AL 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Draexlmaier Automotive 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR KASAI North America, inc 0.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Randazzo Mechanical Heating & Cooling 130 FTE
STATE-SIZE BYERS D.C. DETROIT INC 130 FTE
STATE-SIZE R.L. Adams Plastics, Inc. 130 FTE
STATE-SIZE Novares LLC -Howell 130 FTE
CITY-NEAR MIDET210 ASCENSION PROVIDENCE HOSP - SOUTHFIELD 2,128 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1855-MIDET210 2,027 FTE
CITY-NEAR Barton Malow Holdings, LLC 1,959 FTE
CITY-NEAR DENSO International America, inc. 1,503 FTE
NAT-TCR Thompson Pipe Group 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Hoffman Corporation 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR MINNEAPOLIS 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR S&S Precision 0.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE FACT - Family, Adult & Child Therapies 130 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sorrento Continuing Care Center Ltd. Co. d/b/a Sorrento 130 FTE
NAT-SIZE Brook & Whittle, Ltd. - North Branford 130 FTE
NAT-SIZE 4223-M1100 130 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.